Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations.

Abstract

Social status is a central and universal feature of our highly social species. Reproductively relevant resources, including food, territory, mating opportunities, powerful coalitional alliances, and group-provided health care, flow to those high in status and trickle only slowly to those low in status. Despite its importance and centrality to human social group living, the scientific understanding of status contains a large gap in knowledge-the precise criteria by which individuals are accorded high or low status in the eyes of their group members. It is not known whether there exist universal status criteria, nor the degree to which status criteria vary across cultures. Also unknown is whether status criteria are sex differentiated, and the degree of crosscultural variability and consistency of sex-differentiated status criteria. The current paper investigates status criteria across 14 countries (N = 2,751). Results provide the first systematic documentation of potentially universal and sex-differentiated status criteria. Discussion outlines important next steps in understanding the psychology of status.

Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love

“…Given the relative willingness of men to engage in short-term mating compared to women, it follows that sex because of love plays a greater role in providing sexual access by women to men than the other way around (Meston and Buss, 2007). Sex can facilitate a gain in reputation (Meston and Buss, 2007) and both sexes increase their status by having children (Buss et al, 2020). Sex is intrinsically pleasurable and reinforcing, and promotes bonding (Meltzer et al, 2017).…”

It Takes Two to Tango: Development, Validation, and Personality Correlates of the Acceptance of Sugar Relationships in Older Men and Women Scale (ASR-OMWS)

“…Therefore, the sensitivity of females to resources in the mating context is also an adaptive trait that may have contributed to their reproductive success in the past. However, direct sexual transaction, free from commitment and mutual reproductive goals, is part of a short-term-focused mating strategy (Anderson and Klofstad, 2012;Whyte et al, 2019;Buss et al, 2020). The psychological characteristics of this strategy, which exploits herself/himself and others, are very similar from both the supply and demand sides: to get as many benefits as possible in the shortest possible time, without considering the possible long-term consequences.…”

Pandemic Leadership: Sex Differences and Their Evolutionary–Developmental Origins

“…Nevertheless, it is possible that if leadership is analyzed on different levels of social organization (e.g., within and between families), men and women could show different leadership pattern on different levels-women up to the extended family level, men at higher organizational and societal levels-to the extent that if taking family leadership into account, the overall sex difference in leadership could diminish, vanish, or even reverse, favoring females (Garfield et al, 2019a). Cross-nationally, men's status hinges more on athleticism, bravery, physical formidability, hunting skills, and aspects of leadership, while women's status is more dependent on physical attractiveness and domestic skills (e.g., processing food, childcare) (Buss et al, 2020). Female leaders in horticultural and hunter-gatherer societies were more likely than male leaders to be in a polygynous marriage with a high-quality spouse, to receive more social, reproductive, and material success whilst having less prosocial competence than male leaders .…”