2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619797114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human transposon insertion profiling: Analysis, visualization and identification of somatic LINE-1 insertions in ovarian cancer

Abstract: Mammalian genomes are replete with interspersed repeats reflecting the activity of transposable elements. These mobile DNAs are self-propagating, and their continued transposition is a source of both heritable structural variation as well as somatic mutation in human genomes. Tailored approaches to map these sequences are useful to identify insertion alleles. Here, we describe in detail a strategy to amplify and sequence long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1, L1) retrotransposon insertions selectively in the hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
111
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No exonic tumor-specific mouse L1 insertions were detected. In this regard, the genomic distribution of mouse tumor-specific L1 insertions, although involving at this stage a handful of events, resembles patterns reported for human cancers, where L1 insertions found in exons of known cancer genes (Miki et al 1992;Helman et al 2014;Scott et al 2016) are far rarer than such events located in introns , including the example of the ST18 oncogene (Shukla et al 2013;Rava et al 2017) and a more recent instance in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 (Tang et al 2017). Although the oncogenic impact of intronic tumor-specific L1 insertions is more difficult to mechanistically assess than exonic events, they are also far more numerous and are therefore a potentially important and underexplored class of mutation encountered in mammalian cancers .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…No exonic tumor-specific mouse L1 insertions were detected. In this regard, the genomic distribution of mouse tumor-specific L1 insertions, although involving at this stage a handful of events, resembles patterns reported for human cancers, where L1 insertions found in exons of known cancer genes (Miki et al 1992;Helman et al 2014;Scott et al 2016) are far rarer than such events located in introns , including the example of the ST18 oncogene (Shukla et al 2013;Rava et al 2017) and a more recent instance in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 (Tang et al 2017). Although the oncogenic impact of intronic tumor-specific L1 insertions is more difficult to mechanistically assess than exonic events, they are also far more numerous and are therefore a potentially important and underexplored class of mutation encountered in mammalian cancers .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Targeted resequencing tools exploit specific sequence features of young L1s to selectively amplify and sequence novel L1 insertion junctions. These assays are similar to the previously described L1 Display [82] and L1-Seq [51] assays, often with further improvements in multiplexing, genome coverage, and enrichment of L1 junction fragments prior to sequencing [71,72,77,78,79,81,83,84]. With the decreased price of WGS, and the availability of such data in public repositories, several groups have developed bioinformatics tools to discover somatic L1 insertions in silico using WGS or WES data [70,74,75,80].…”
Section: Somatic L1 Activity In Human Genomesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Several studies have used NGS to investigate TEs, especially those associated with humans and diseases (e.g., Ewing & Kazazian, ; Ewing & Kazazian, , Tang et al, ; Tubio et al, ). The MobiSeq method presented here can generate many thousands of unique sequences per sample, each containing the TE sequence and the flanking genomic regions, which are subsequently used for SNP discovery and genotyping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have used NGS to investigate TEs, especially those associated with humans and diseases (e.g., Ewing & Kazazian, REY-IGLESIA ET AL. | 513 2010; Ewing & Kazazian, 2011, Tang et al, 2017Tubio et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%