2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/haptic.2010.5444685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human vs. robotic tactile sensing: Detecting lumps in soft tissue

Abstract: Humans can localize lumps in soft tissue using the distributed tactile feedback and processing afforded by the fingers and brain. This task becomes extremely difficult when the fingers are not in direct contact with the tissue, such as in laparoscopic or robot-assisted procedures. Tactile sensors have been proposed to characterize and detect lumps in robot-assisted palpation. In this work, we compare the performance of a capacitive tactile sensor with that of the human finger. We evaluate the response of the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each trial, a particular phantom was placed below the GelSight device, and the pad was pressed against the phantom with a given amount of force. Following, Gwilliam et al [6], we express the force in gram equivalent units. Table 2 shows the conversion to Newton.…”
Section: Approach Of Using Gelsight In Lump Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For each trial, a particular phantom was placed below the GelSight device, and the pad was pressed against the phantom with a given amount of force. Following, Gwilliam et al [6], we express the force in gram equivalent units. Table 2 shows the conversion to Newton.…”
Section: Approach Of Using Gelsight In Lump Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the DigiTacts Sensor Gwilliam et al [6] introduced a lump detection experiment using the DigiTacts II capacitive sensor. Phantoms used in their experiments are similar to what we have used for testing the GelSight sensor, but they focused their work on larger lumps with shallower depths than we did.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Gelsight Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations