“…National constitutional courts do not reject the primacy of the ECHR, but in many cases they relativize the content of its decisions, and as a rule, they do 88 Corus Steel (CA U.S. Fed Circuit), Judgment of 21 January 2005, Available at: http://www.cafc. 91 Neves (2009), p. 117. not accept direct application of exogenous decisions. Corus Staal BV and Corus Steel USA Inc. ("Corus") appealed the judgment of the Court of International Trade against the U.S. Department of Commerce and others, questioning its methodology for calculating the average margin to verify the occurrence of dumping, in particular, its methodology of "zeroing," claiming it was unfair because of uncertain aggregated values that were part of the transactions.…”