2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humanized mice reveal a macrophage-enriched gene signature defining human lung tissue protection during SARS-CoV-2 infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
29
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our model, pathology appeared dependent on the infecting viral variant with B.1.1.7 producing significantly fewer lesions in animals solely implanted with human lung and not a human immune system, whereas VIDO-01 pathology was similar in both situations. Overall and similar to our findings, most models showed generation of pathogenic lesions and induction of cytokines responses that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans and a role for the implanted human immune system in clearing the infection [ 37 , 44 , 68 , 74 ]. However, it appears imperative to carefully design studies of SARS-CoV-2 and interpret data with the limitations of each specific type of humanized lung mouse model and the specific viral variant being used in mind.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our model, pathology appeared dependent on the infecting viral variant with B.1.1.7 producing significantly fewer lesions in animals solely implanted with human lung and not a human immune system, whereas VIDO-01 pathology was similar in both situations. Overall and similar to our findings, most models showed generation of pathogenic lesions and induction of cytokines responses that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans and a role for the implanted human immune system in clearing the infection [ 37 , 44 , 68 , 74 ]. However, it appears imperative to carefully design studies of SARS-CoV-2 and interpret data with the limitations of each specific type of humanized lung mouse model and the specific viral variant being used in mind.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other humanized lung mice have been generated on immunocompromised mouse backgrounds for the study of SARS-CoV-2 [ 37 , 44 , 68 , 74 ]. To our knowledge, ours is the first bone marrow, liver, thymus (BLT) model to be implanted with lung and used to assess SARS-CoV-2 infection whereas previous SARS-CoV-2 investigations were performed either in models solely implanted with human lung [ 37 , 44 ] and/or were additionally injected with fetal liver CD34 + cells to generate human immune system (HIS) mice [ 68 , 74 ]. Direct comparisons between the lung lesions and immune responses are difficult between the models as each type of humanization results in different levels of human immune reconstitution and immune functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shows that infection with all SARS-CoV-2 variants in macrophages presents no replication although a discrete increased viral load was observed with α-SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan), δ-B.1.617 (India) and β-B.1.351 (South Africa) variants. This is reminiscent of previous studies showing that SARS-CoV-2 efficiently infects human macrophages without replication ( 17 , 47 , 48 ), similar to SARS-CoV-1 ( 16 , 49 51 ) suggesting a protective role for macrophage during SARS-CoV infection at it was recently reported in humanized mice model ( 52 ). It is likely that variations in macrophage response to SARS-CoV-2 variants may be a consequence of changes in ACE2 expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Conversely, the tenascin-X member of the tenascin family is significantly downregulated in COVID-19 patient sera compared to healthy controls ( 67 ), as well as in lung tissue as a result of remodeling and destruction of ECM components that occur during COVID-19 progression ( 68 ). These findings are recapitulated in a humanized animal model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, where tenascin-X levels are significantly downregulated in the lung 2 days postinfection ( 69 ). As SARS-CoV-2 cannot infect mice, these humanized mouse models represent relevant systems to study lung and immune human responses during infection in vivo ( 70 , 71 ).…”
Section: What Is the Function Of Tenascin-c In Viral Infection?mentioning
confidence: 80%