2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humidity sensors based on silica nanoparticle aerogel thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C -value increased from 3.2183 × 10 −11 F to 9.9741 × 10 −10 F with a “ S ” of ~3000% at the signal frequency of 10 2 Hz but when the test frequency is 10 5 Hz, the capacitance varied from 1.2832 × 10 −11 to 2.8174 × 10 −11 F with “ S ” of ~120% across the RH range of 33%–95%, respectively. The sensitivity of our developed sensor is higher than that of some other ceramic based humidity sensors reported elsewhere (for example, ~2900% for porous ZnAl 2 O 4 spinel nanorod, 85% for silica nanoparticles aerogel thin films, ~966% for SiC nanowires, ~800% for thermally carbonized porous silicon, ~500% for alumina nanowire, 1490% for (PEPC + NiPc + Cu 2 O) and so on based humidity sensors) [16,56,57,58,59,60]. Therefore, in our further study the 10 2 Hz would be considered as best test frequency for the analysis of sensor characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The C -value increased from 3.2183 × 10 −11 F to 9.9741 × 10 −10 F with a “ S ” of ~3000% at the signal frequency of 10 2 Hz but when the test frequency is 10 5 Hz, the capacitance varied from 1.2832 × 10 −11 to 2.8174 × 10 −11 F with “ S ” of ~120% across the RH range of 33%–95%, respectively. The sensitivity of our developed sensor is higher than that of some other ceramic based humidity sensors reported elsewhere (for example, ~2900% for porous ZnAl 2 O 4 spinel nanorod, 85% for silica nanoparticles aerogel thin films, ~966% for SiC nanowires, ~800% for thermally carbonized porous silicon, ~500% for alumina nanowire, 1490% for (PEPC + NiPc + Cu 2 O) and so on based humidity sensors) [16,56,57,58,59,60]. Therefore, in our further study the 10 2 Hz would be considered as best test frequency for the analysis of sensor characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, only S1050/PDMS composite could be used to develop a flexible composite film with potentially the best in performance. The capacitance values of the S1050 ceramic and S1050/PDMS composite film were in the order of 10 −10 F and 10 −11 F, respectively, which closely resembled those of different nanoparticles and composites [50,51]. The capacitance value of the S1050/PDMS composite film is significantly higher than the other titanate fibrous materials [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In humidity sensing, silicon-based materials contribute good response towards humidity measurement [4]. Chien-Tsung et al found that porous silica substrate gives better humidity sensing properties as better trapping of polar type water molecules is achievable with large number of pores on surface [5]. El Kamel et al states that Ptbased substrates are suitable for deposition of perovskite materials such as BaTiO 3 due to its high electron affinity and allowable for high temperature process [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%