2005
DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract200531316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humor, Context, and Divided Cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These pollution codes generally focus on one of two patterns: excess or inappropriate juxtaposition. These two patterns conform to what one would expect concerning the nature of humor (Gross, 2007;Lengbeyer, 2005;Shifman, 2007). Through the two patterns of excess and incongruent juxtaposition, these pollution codes contaminate common systems of classification in modern, mainstream, White American social life.…”
Section: If You [Pause] Have a Half-built Truck Engine In The Front Yard Of Your Trailer Home [Pause] You Might Be A Rednecksupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These pollution codes generally focus on one of two patterns: excess or inappropriate juxtaposition. These two patterns conform to what one would expect concerning the nature of humor (Gross, 2007;Lengbeyer, 2005;Shifman, 2007). Through the two patterns of excess and incongruent juxtaposition, these pollution codes contaminate common systems of classification in modern, mainstream, White American social life.…”
Section: If You [Pause] Have a Half-built Truck Engine In The Front Yard Of Your Trailer Home [Pause] You Might Be A Rednecksupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, let us play along for the time being. David Benatar (1999), among a host of others (Gaut 1998;Goldstein 1995;Lengbeyer 2005) argues that we can as best as possible, determine whether we ascribe to a negative stereotype by considering a joke which contains a negative stereotype, particularly one that includes something about yourself:…”
Section: Humour Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, any number of contextual variables need to be taken into account in order to predict how individuals will respond to a humorous political message. When joke tellers justify flops with, “I guess you had to be there,” they indicate the weight of context (Lengbeyer, , p. 320). And as Meyer () has noted, “attempts at humor that meet with success depend directly on the specific audience and the situation in question” (p. 316).…”
Section: Social Scientific and Rhetorical Accounts Of Political Humormentioning
confidence: 99%