2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00434-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humoral immune responses following experimental infection of goats with Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current prevalence is lower than other studies in the country (Gezahegn 1993;Bereket 1995;Sharew et al 2005). One of the reasons for this could be the low seroprevalence of CFT, which might be related to the ability of the test to detect antibody that appear first and span short duration in the blood which could be due to the limitations of CFT as observed by March et al (2002). March et al (2002), did not observe significant CFT titres in infected goats 21 days post infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the current prevalence is lower than other studies in the country (Gezahegn 1993;Bereket 1995;Sharew et al 2005). One of the reasons for this could be the low seroprevalence of CFT, which might be related to the ability of the test to detect antibody that appear first and span short duration in the blood which could be due to the limitations of CFT as observed by March et al (2002). March et al (2002), did not observe significant CFT titres in infected goats 21 days post infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…One of the reasons for this could be the low seroprevalence of CFT, which might be related to the ability of the test to detect antibody that appear first and span short duration in the blood which could be due to the limitations of CFT as observed by March et al (2002). March et al (2002), did not observe significant CFT titres in infected goats 21 days post infection. Therefore, at an early stage in a field outbreak, false negative results based upon serological diagnosis are a real possibility as observed in Shabba PA where only few positive cases detected by CFT test despite the presence of clinical cases of CCPP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers pointed at the importance of the complement fixation titer, as an amplifier of the humoral immune responses (March et al 2002;Wesonga et al 2004;Castro et al 2008), which will help the animal to overcome the invading pathogens by a cascade of enzymatic reactions performed by the C1-C9 complements (Rao 2006;Castro et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primary infected goats, CCPP last for about two days with high mortality (McMartin et al 1980) while in other cases it may last for several days (OIE 2009). However, in the experimental infection model of March et al (2002), Mccp was not isolated from the infected lungs of goats (eight week post infection) due to the development of humoral immunity (IgG, IgM).…”
Section: Incubation Period Of Mycoplasma Capricolum Subsp Capripneummentioning
confidence: 99%