2023
DOI: 10.3390/foods13010065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hunted Wild Boars in Sardinia: Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Genomic Analysis of Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica

Giuliana Siddi,
Francesca Piras,
Maria Pina Meloni
et al.

Abstract: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica prevalence in wild boars hunted in Sardinia and further characterize the isolates and analyse antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns. In order to assess slaughtering hygiene, an evaluation of carcasses microbial contamination was also carried out. Between 2020 and 2022, samples were collected from 66 wild boars hunted during two hunting seasons from the area of two provinces in northern and central Sardinia (Italy). Sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have reported the absence of Salmonella spp. on carcass surfaces [40][41][42][43][44] and meat [45][46][47], whereas other authors have reported a prevalence similar to those found in our survey, in nearby geographic areas of Italy (0.9% in carcass swabs from the Campania region; 1.1% in carcass swabs from the Emilia Romagna region [39]; from 2.0% to 6.0% in carcass swabs from the Emilia Romagna region [48]; 3.9% in muscles from the Lazio region [49]; and 4.55% in meat cuts from the Tuscany region [50]) or in other countries (1.4% in carcass swabs and 1.9% in meat samples from Serbia [51]; 1.2% in carcass swabs from Spain [52]; and 3.1% in carcass samples from Serbia [53]. Higher prevalence values have been reported for Salmonella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have reported the absence of Salmonella spp. on carcass surfaces [40][41][42][43][44] and meat [45][46][47], whereas other authors have reported a prevalence similar to those found in our survey, in nearby geographic areas of Italy (0.9% in carcass swabs from the Campania region; 1.1% in carcass swabs from the Emilia Romagna region [39]; from 2.0% to 6.0% in carcass swabs from the Emilia Romagna region [48]; 3.9% in muscles from the Lazio region [49]; and 4.55% in meat cuts from the Tuscany region [50]) or in other countries (1.4% in carcass swabs and 1.9% in meat samples from Serbia [51]; 1.2% in carcass swabs from Spain [52]; and 3.1% in carcass samples from Serbia [53]. Higher prevalence values have been reported for Salmonella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%