2021
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/hz9a3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hunter-gatherer children in the past: an archaeological review

Abstract: Theoretical engagement and methodological innovations geared towards identifying the presence and activities of children in archaeological contexts has increased in pace over the last decade. This paper presents a systematic review of the literature pertaining to the archaeology of hunter-gatherer children. The review summarises methods and findings from 72 archaeological publications in a number of research areas that show material culture relating to childhood, including children’s playthings and tools, lear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(245 reference statements)
1
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree to which artefact size can confidently be used to infer toys in the archaeological record has been a matter of debate (see Crawford, 2009;Park, 1998Park, , 2005. While we have not systematically investigated adults' use of miniatures in ritual or quotidian contexts, the prominence of miniatures in our dataset lends credence to the interpretation of objects at the lower end of a given size distribution as play-objects, such as the scaled-down spear-thrower handles from the Oregon Coast (100-800 CE) discussed by Losey and Hull (2019) and the small organic spear-tips of the European Late Upper Palaeolithic (18-15 ka BP) presented by Langley (2018) and Pfeifer (2015) respectively (see Milks et al, 2021 for further examples). In addition, the cross-cultural prevalence of human and animal figurines aligns well with interpretations of many Palaeolithic (Farbstein et al, 2012;Lbova, 2021) and post-Palaeolithic (see Langley & Litster, 2018;Sommer & Sommer, 2015) figurines as potential play objects, alongside the more common interpretation of prehistoric figurines as religious/ritual objects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The degree to which artefact size can confidently be used to infer toys in the archaeological record has been a matter of debate (see Crawford, 2009;Park, 1998Park, , 2005. While we have not systematically investigated adults' use of miniatures in ritual or quotidian contexts, the prominence of miniatures in our dataset lends credence to the interpretation of objects at the lower end of a given size distribution as play-objects, such as the scaled-down spear-thrower handles from the Oregon Coast (100-800 CE) discussed by Losey and Hull (2019) and the small organic spear-tips of the European Late Upper Palaeolithic (18-15 ka BP) presented by Langley (2018) and Pfeifer (2015) respectively (see Milks et al, 2021 for further examples). In addition, the cross-cultural prevalence of human and animal figurines aligns well with interpretations of many Palaeolithic (Farbstein et al, 2012;Lbova, 2021) and post-Palaeolithic (see Langley & Litster, 2018;Sommer & Sommer, 2015) figurines as potential play objects, alongside the more common interpretation of prehistoric figurines as religious/ritual objects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Sin embargo, como se adelantó en la introducción, las conductas actuales, y al igual que la biología y la fisiología, son el resultado de la adaptación a diferentes ambientes a lo largo de la evolución (Caro & Borgerhoff Mulder, 1987;Nettle et al, 2013), por lo que no se descarta que tales actividades ya fueran comunes en el pasado, sobre todo atendiendo a las dos actividades de recolección (Aranguren et al, 2018;D'Errico et al, 2012;Hunt, 1994;Revedin, Grimaldi, Florindi, Santaniello, & Aranguren, 2020;Rios-Garaizar et al, 2018;Zeller, 1987) y, sin duda alguna, a la tercera referente a la locomoción (Hatala et al, 2016;Hunt, 1994;Vidal-Cordasco, 2020;Vidal-Cordasco et al, 2021). Además, como destacan Milks y colaboradores (2021), prestando atención al registro etnográfico actual se puede obtener una mejor comprensión del comportamiento humano y la diversidad cultural, lo que puede ampliar los marcos interpretativos para comprender el pasado (Milks, Lew-Levy, Lavi, Friesem, & Reckin, 2021).…”
Section: Limitaciones De La Investigaciónunclassified