2021
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hunter–gatherer foraging networks promote information transmission

Abstract: Central-place foraging (CPF), where foragers return to a central location (or home), is a key feature of hunter–gatherer social organization. CPF could have significantly changed hunter–gatherers’ spatial use and mobility, altered social networks and increased opportunities for information-exchange. We evaluated whether CPF patterns facilitate information-transmission and considered the potential roles of environmental conditions, mobility strategies and population sizes. We built an agent-based model of CPF w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(141 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile hunter–gatherer societies are extensive multilevel fission–fusion societies characterized by fluid, open composition and movement of individuals and family units among residential groups [ 31 ,– 34 , 46 , 47 ]. Information can move among groups of humans far more rapidly than for other hominoids [ 48 , 49 ]. At some point—a first key set of transitions—hominins were able to interact cooperatively with individuals from other groups, and the portal for the viral flow of cultural information began to open.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile hunter–gatherer societies are extensive multilevel fission–fusion societies characterized by fluid, open composition and movement of individuals and family units among residential groups [ 31 ,– 34 , 46 , 47 ]. Information can move among groups of humans far more rapidly than for other hominoids [ 48 , 49 ]. At some point—a first key set of transitions—hominins were able to interact cooperatively with individuals from other groups, and the portal for the viral flow of cultural information began to open.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Did language evolve as a third-party information tool to facilitate larger groups [58][59][60]? Did the structural solutions for macro-network management, like fission-fusion pattern, evolve to facilitate large groups or to facilitate temporal variation in the environment's carrying capacity [61][62][63][64][65]? In particular, is baboon-like fission-fusion dynamic a clue towards the evolution of the ability to form large complex groups in humans, or is this a case for parallel evolution [14,66]?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our model, interaction forces are constructed such that agents maintain a minimum distance from each other, in order to avoid the overlap of their foraging areas (i.e. areas regularly used for subsistence activities by their members), as has been reported in the literature [ 12 , 22 , 49 ].…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the mobility process does not describe the mobility of the camp members, but the relocation of the camp position, i.e. 'residential mobility', which is one of the defining features of hunter-gatherers around the world and has been proposed to have important implications for cultural transmission and evolution [12,22,23,[43][44][45]. The demographic changes of the population D(t) are modelled deterministically with population growth and decline depending on the carrying capacity of the landscape as well as the system state Y(t).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation