Considerations of Jews in antiquity commonly emphasize the role of common institutions (such as the Jerusalem Temple) and shared traumatic experiences (such as exile) in generating distinctive modes of memory formation and memorialization. This paper takes a different approach. By drawing from recent discussions of memory and postmemory developed in the fields of sociology, anthropology, and visual studies, and by considering diverse data from wall paintings, ceiling decorations, inscriptions, graffiti, and mosaics, the ensuing analysis demonstrates how variegated were the practices and dynamics of memory among Jews living in Roman Syria and elsewhere. Asking different types of questions about memorial practices documented in synagogues and surrounding buildings in Dura-Europos and Apamea challenges regnant assumptions about commonalities in Jewish memory and argues for a more localized and spatial approach to Jewish memory practices, the dynamics of which were as personal as they were collective, and as particular as they were locally contingent.Syria, can assist efforts to triangulate more locally inflected insights into Jewish life and memory practices.Syria, in particular, offers a critical test-site for a contextual reconsideration of memory and memorial practices among ancient Jews, because archaeological evidence for regional Jewish populations remains relatively rich and abundant. 4 Only in Syrian Apamea, for instance, did excavators uncover the best-preserved synagogue floor from anywhere in the ancient Jewish diaspora as an intact mosaic carpet, replete with geometric designs and dedicatory inscriptions. 5 And only in the remarkably preserved town of Dura-Europos did excavators discover an ancient synagogue that retained its standing walls, decorated with narrative scenes interpreting the Hebrew Bible; an elaborate ceiling, whose tiles were painted with fanciful designs and commemorative inscriptions; and components of walls and doorways, encrusted with scores of memorial graffiti. In the case of Dura, moreover, exemplary preservation of neighbouring buildings ensures something commensurately unusual: an ability to examine how substantively did certain dimensions of local Jews' memory practices emerge from (and respond to) those of their immediate cultural environments.This paper argues that attention to certain images and texts from the Dura-Europos synagogue, when compared to examples from other Durene buildings and from synagogues in Apamea and elsewhere in the region, reveals how complex and localized certain aspects of ancient Jewish practices of memory and memorialization were, both regionally and chronologically. As such evaluations ultimately indicate, memory practices were neither uniform among Jews throughout ancient Syria, nor were they likely so elsewhere in antiquity. They were not, moreover, wholly or identically related to traumatic events of 'global' proportions, such as the destruction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem (70 ce). 6 Analysing identifiable epigraphic, architectural, and dec...