2006
DOI: 10.1177/0002716205284676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas

Abstract: The unprecedented losses from Hurricane Katrina can be explained by two paradoxes. The safe development paradox is that in trying to make hazardous areas safer, the federal government in fact substantially increased the potential for catastrophic property damages and economic loss. The local government paradox is that while their citizens bear the brunt of human suffering and financial loss in disasters, local officials pay insufficient attention to policies to limit vulnerability. The author demonstrates in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
348
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 528 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(11 reference statements)
4
348
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of disaster mitigation skills that can be performed by students at the primary school does not spread as well as adults because of the limitations of their mindset (Comfort, Oh, Ertan, & Scheinert, 2010). In simple skills disaster mitigation to be possessed by students at least consists of: the skill to avoid disaster, to protect themselves and help others (Burby, 2006). It is believed that all three mitigation skills using simple language and procedures of the appropriate mindset of primary school students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of disaster mitigation skills that can be performed by students at the primary school does not spread as well as adults because of the limitations of their mindset (Comfort, Oh, Ertan, & Scheinert, 2010). In simple skills disaster mitigation to be possessed by students at least consists of: the skill to avoid disaster, to protect themselves and help others (Burby, 2006). It is believed that all three mitigation skills using simple language and procedures of the appropriate mindset of primary school students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legacy issues are an issue that governments and the insurance sector are now grappling with. The authors believe that nothing will change until local councils are held accountable for bad land-use planning decisions [37]. Resolving the problem is not simple, but risk-adjusted insurance premiums must form part of the solution [38].…”
Section: Insurance Issues and Implications For Land-use Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the residual risk of extreme flood events, dike failure or flooding of "protected" areas caused by groundwater or sewerage systems is not communicated; citizens and businesses in those areas are unaware of being at risk and accumulate remarkable amounts of values. This increase of damage potential in "protected" areas is also referred to as "safe development paradox" [17] or "levee effect" [18,19]. Furthermore, there is evidence that the damage potential is at its highest directly behind the boundary line of designated risk zones [20].…”
Section: A Paradigm Shift In German Flood Policy?mentioning
confidence: 99%