HVAC System Noise Prediction through CFD Simulation

Kandekar, Ambadas Bhaguji; Nagarhalli, Prasanna V; Dol, Yogesh; Thakur, Sunil; Gupta, B. P.; Jadhav, Tushar

doi:10.4271/2019-26-0210

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They demonstrated in the numerical computation of a side channel blower (Kaltenbacher et al, 2016). Kandekar et al (2019) investigated flow-induced noise in the 400 Hz to 5000 Hz frequency range and discussed a Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) approach for simulating. They validated through testing with good correlation between CFD predictions and measurements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Geometric Parameters of Perforated Diffuser on Sound Pressure Level Sourced By Airflow

ERDOĞAN,

AKSOY,

CANBAZOĞLU

2024

Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the aeroacoustic behaviors of a square truncated perforated diffuser under airflow, commonly used in Air Handling Units (AHUs). The design parameters are fundamentally taken into account to unveil the aeroacoustic performance of the diffuser. Initially, unsteady-state Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations are conducted based on models that accurately represent the fluid domain of the chamber with the perforated diffuser in the ANSYS Fluent environment. Subsequently, the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) method integrated into the software is employed to acquire time-dependent signals from microphones placed in three different locations within a perforated diffuser chamber. Finally, by converting the results to a frequency range of 0-1000 Hz by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) method and sound pressure level (SPL) values are obtained. Finally, the results are converted to a frequency range of 0-1000 Hz using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) method, and the SPL values are obtained. The results show that the microphone location is crucially important to determine SPL and the porosity reduction from 0.55 to 0.35 can reduce SPL by approximately 30-40 dB. Variations in wall thickness of the diffuser fluctuated between 5-10 dB at each frequency value.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%