Hybrid Arrangements as a Form of Ecological Modernization: The Case of the US Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grants

Abstract

How are environmental policy goals implemented and sustained in the context of political stagnation surrounding national climate policies in the United States? In this paper, we discuss Ecological Modernization Theory as a tool for understanding the complexity of climate governance at the sub-national level. In particular, we explore the emergence of hybrid governance arrangements during the local implementation of federal energy efficiency programs in US cities. We analyze the formation and advancement of programs associated with one effort to establish a sub-national low carbon energy policy: the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) program administered by the US Department of Energy. Our findings highlight the diverse range of partnerships between state, private, and civil society actors that emerged through this program and point to some of the challenges associated with collaborative climate governance initiatives at the city level. Although some programs reflected ecologically modern outcomes, other cities were constrained in their ability to move beyond the status quo due to the demands of state bureaucracies and the challenges associated with inconsistent funding. We find that these programs cultivated hybrid arrangements in an effort to sustain the projects following the termination of federal grant funding. Overall, hybrid governance plays an important role in the implementation and long-term sustainability of climate-related policies.

Ending the Stalemate: Toward a Theory of Anthro-Shift

“…In addition to implementing environmental regulation through administration-driven efforts, including executive orders, the Obama administration supported the expansion of the “green economy” through numerous tax incentives and investments. 7 For example, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 invested, in part, in more environmentally sound technologies (Galli and Fisher 2016). Although the Obama administration did not solve the environmental challenges facing society, its policies led to nontrivial reductions of numerous environmental bads, including decreased levels of carbon emissions in the United States.…”

Social Science Perspectives on Drivers of and Responses to Global Climate Change

“…In some cases, this work encourages the multi-level governance of climate change, which crosses scales and frequently involves a broader range of policy actors in the decisionmaking process (Bulkeley 2005;Galli and Fisher 2016). Research in this area also maps out how networks of policy elites are engaging in the climate debate (Fisher, Leifeld, et al 2013;Fisher, Waggle, et al 2013;Fisher et al 2018).…”

Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change

“…Other bodies of research in sociology and geography have pointed to subnational opportunities to fill what has been called a climate “policy void” in U.S. politics (Fisher, ; Jones, ; Krane, ; Rabe, ; Shwom, ). In some cases, this work encourages the multi‐level governance of climate change, which crosses scales and frequently involves a broader range of policy actors in the decision‐making process (Bulkeley, ; Galli & Fisher, ). Research in this area also maps out how networks of policy elites are engaging in the climate debate (Fisher et al, ; Fisher, Leifeld, & Iwaki, ; Fisher, Waggle, & Leifeld, ).…”