2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid biogeography based simultaneous feature selection and MHC class I peptide binding prediction using support vector machines and random forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the hybrid filter-wrapper algorithm was employed to select a subset of potential prognostic variables 24. The proposed FSS process was conducted on 64 IC/CCRT, 72 IC/RT, and overall patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the hybrid filter-wrapper algorithm was employed to select a subset of potential prognostic variables 24. The proposed FSS process was conducted on 64 IC/CCRT, 72 IC/RT, and overall patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we addressed these problems by employing a rigorous processing framework. This framework consist of two well-founded steps, a hybrid filter-wrapper FSS to select a concise yet informative biomarker panel and a prognostic classification through the AdaBoost algorithm 24. In the FSS step, a recently reported model of LH-RELIEF was used to find the potential candidate variables 25.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SMM not only predicted HLA binding but also evaluated peptide transport as a function of antigen presentation and proteasomal cleavage with the TAP algorithm. Subsequent efforts to develop new class I binding affinity prediction softwares have included the use of combined support vector machine-based (SVM) and random forest machine-learning approaches (Srivastava et al, 2013), or combining the information obtained from amino acid pairwise contact potentials and quantum topology molecular similarity descriptors (Saethang et al, 2013) to better model HLA class I peptide interactions.…”
Section: Somatic Mutations Generate Neoantigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final step in neoantigen discovery is the prediction of binding affinities for each novel somatic mutation-translated set of peptides to the patient’s HLA proteins. The development of modeling algorithms that calculate HLA binding affinities has been an active area of research that has resulted in several approaches such as analysis by neural network-based algorithms that are trained on measured binding affinities (e.g., NetMHC), scattering-matrix method (SMM)-based approaches, and others ( Peters and Sette 2005 ; Lundegaard et al 2008 ; Srivastava et al 2013 ). The large number of algorithms indicates the attendant difficulty of identifying neoantigens, although precision has improved over time, especially for class I HLA proteins, for which more experimental data exist, even for the more rare haplotypes.…”
Section: Immunogenomics and Neoantigen Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%