2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid block-AMR in cartesian and curvilinear coordinates: MHD applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many modern numerical schemes are usually established in Cartesian coordinates and can be directly used in solar wind modeling without any further modification. For these reasons, Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) have also been widely used (Groth et al 2000;van der Holst & Keppens 2007;Kleimann et al 2009), for which numerics are faster, simpler (esp ecially with respect to multidimensional extension), and more stable. This is especially true for an MHD code built within a framework that allows for Cartesian AMR (e.g., Groth et al 2000;van der Holst & Keppens 2007;Kleimann et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many modern numerical schemes are usually established in Cartesian coordinates and can be directly used in solar wind modeling without any further modification. For these reasons, Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) have also been widely used (Groth et al 2000;van der Holst & Keppens 2007;Kleimann et al 2009), for which numerics are faster, simpler (esp ecially with respect to multidimensional extension), and more stable. This is especially true for an MHD code built within a framework that allows for Cartesian AMR (e.g., Groth et al 2000;van der Holst & Keppens 2007;Kleimann et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to adequately implement the Sun's spherical surface as an inner boundary on the Cartesian grid, a weighted averaging procedure (Kleimann et al 2009) was devised in order to handle the huge gradients (most notably of mass density) occurring at this boundary. To deal with the spherical surface inner boundary, an alternative method is to allow for arbitrary embedded boundaries in the Cartesian geometry by employing a cut-cell method (e.g., Zeeuw & Powell 1993;Groth et al 2000;van der Holst & Keppens 2007). The use of these procedures also contributes to a reduction of spurious departures from the problem's underlying symmetry, which results from the fact that the Sun's spherical boundary surface cannot be mapped to a Cartesian grid of finite cell spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressions for the wave speeds, as obtained for different reference frames in relative motion to each other, have been used as basic ingredients for the current suite of relativistic magnetofluid codes. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Knowledge of the ͑fastest͒ characteristic speeds embedded in the relativistic MHD equations is essential to obtain time-step stability limits for explicit time-stepping strategies, while many modern RMHD codes use more complete information on all linear wave dynamics. This information is incorporated in the eigenvectors of the flux Jacobian, with the fluxes appearing in the governing hyperbolic equations for the conserved variables, typically formulated in a 3 + 1 formulation where a fixed laboratory frame is selected.…”
Section: Introduction: Relativistic Mhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the BATS-R-US code (Powell et al, 1999), or in the AMR-VAC code (van der Holst and Keppens, 2007). Currently, only two groups have developed advanced 3D coupled MHD models to model a CME event from its initiation up to the interaction with the magnetosphere of the Earth: the CORHEL model at the University of Boston and the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) (Tó th et al, 2005) at the University of Michigan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%