2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid bounds for Rankin–Selberg L-functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The works involving estimates of these sums with the divisor functions, known as the additive divisor problems, have a long history (See [DFIw94,Mo94] and the reference given there). Shifted convolution sums with two Fourier coefficients have been extensively investigated in [BlHa14,DFIw93,Ha03,HaMi06,Mi04] for the case when λ g (n) = λ f (n) or λ g (n) = λ f (n) and [HoMu13,HoZh17] for the general case. Thus it is natural to compare the strategies of the existing approaches and ponder about the tools necessary to study the hybrid level aspect problem.…”
Section: Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The works involving estimates of these sums with the divisor functions, known as the additive divisor problems, have a long history (See [DFIw94,Mo94] and the reference given there). Shifted convolution sums with two Fourier coefficients have been extensively investigated in [BlHa14,DFIw93,Ha03,HaMi06,Mi04] for the case when λ g (n) = λ f (n) or λ g (n) = λ f (n) and [HoMu13,HoZh17] for the general case. Thus it is natural to compare the strategies of the existing approaches and ponder about the tools necessary to study the hybrid level aspect problem.…”
Section: Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid range 0 < η < 1 of Blomer and Harcos is stronger than our range 0 < η < 2/5. However we emphasize that our technique does not require amplification or the large sieve inequality and recently this method is adopted in [HoZh17] to extend a hybrid subconvexity range bound for…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holowinsky and Munshi [11] obtained a sub-convexity bound for this problem as long as p ≤ q η , with η = 2 21 . Hou and Zhang extended this to η = 2 15 [14]. Assuming that the form with the smaller level is holomorphic Zhilin Ye [33] proves a sub-convexity bound for all η.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The hybrid range 0 < η < 1 of Blomer and Harcos is stronger than our range 0 < η < 2/5. However we emphasize that our technique does not require amplification or Large Sieve inequality and recently this method is adopted in [11] to extend a hybrid subconvexity range bound for L(1/2, g ⊗ h) where g is a primitive holomorphic cusp form of level M and h is a primitive either holomorphic or Mass cusp form of level P with (M, P ) = 1, M a squarefree integer, and P a prime. Of course, one has the ability to push the analysis further, in either method, by analyzing the resulting sum of Kloosterman sums through Large Sieve inequality similar to the work of Z. Ye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%