2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid carbon nanoparticles modified core–shell silica: A high efficiency carbon-based phase for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porous graphitic carbon (PGC) is potentially a suitable material due to its chemical and thermal stability and unique selectivity, which is different to that of silica. Carbon nanoparticles can alternatively be deposited on the surface of silica [18]. PGC is strongly hydrophobic and can give excessive retention in some cases, so various ligands have been bonded to the material to alter the surface polarity [19,20].…”
Section: Stationary Phase Substrates; Particulate and Monolith Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Porous graphitic carbon (PGC) is potentially a suitable material due to its chemical and thermal stability and unique selectivity, which is different to that of silica. Carbon nanoparticles can alternatively be deposited on the surface of silica [18]. PGC is strongly hydrophobic and can give excessive retention in some cases, so various ligands have been bonded to the material to alter the surface polarity [19,20].…”
Section: Stationary Phase Substrates; Particulate and Monolith Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was based on the selection of pairs of test compounds which supposedly differed only in a single interaction mode, otherwise behaving identically, although it was acknowledged that finding such ideal pairs is virtually impossible. Solutes were also chosen so as to have low (19,20,21); bare silica phases (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) and zwitterionic phases (1)(2)(3)(4). The columns were further divided into 4 slightly different groups according to their main selectivity a) Cation exchange characterised by unmodified silica; b) anion exchange exhibited by amino phases; c) dipole-dipole and multipoint H bonding exhibited by polymeric sulfobetaine and poly(2-sulfoethylaspartamide) and d) low specific interactions, exhibited by diol and amide phases.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Hilic Stationary Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion pair reagent in the mobile phase would present negative effects to MS measurements. Hydrophilic columns were reported to be good at separation of polar compounds without ion pair reagents [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Amide column, which behaves hydrophilic function for chromatographic separation, was introduced to separate FAcOH in urine in this study.…”
Section: Lc Separation Of Facohmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4a), retention of toluene and uracil is reversed indicating that the column can also be used under reversed phase condition, similar to other mixed-mode stationary phases. 42,43 Compared with the previously reported benzoic acid PGC column, the core-shell silica based column shows higher efficiencies and better peak shapes than PGC.…”
Section: Changing the Chromatography Modementioning
confidence: 99%