The constant technological developments in noninvasive cardiac imaging over the past few decades have contributed toward our pathophysiologic understanding of many conditions. Particularly in coronary artery disease (CAD), management is based on the assessment of both the presence of coronary stenoses and their hemodynamic consequences. 1,2 Hence, noninvasive imaging helps guide therapeutic decisions by providing complementary information on coronary morphology and on myocardial perfusion and metabolism, using several imaging tools. 3,4 This imaging includes nuclear techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT) techniques such as electron-beam CT (EBCT) or multislice CT (MSCT), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).Advances in image-processing software and the advent of hybrid scanners have paved the way for the fusion of image datasets from different modalities, giving rise to multimodality or hybrid imaging. This technology avoids the mental integration of functional and morphologic images, and facilitates a comprehensive interpretation of combined datasets. The interest in hybrid imaging has rapidly spread to cardiac applications, and has changed the landscape of noninvasive cardiac imaging by bringing different clinical specialties (eg, cardiology, radiology, and nuclear medicine) closer together. 5 In addition, this interest has driven the development and production of dedicated hybrid scanners in an effort to simplify image coregistration and improve patient throughput for specialized cardiac imaging centers (ie, hardware-based image coregistration). However, given the high costs associated with such devices, an attractive alternative for hybrid imaging consists of the "offline," software-based fusion of images obtained from nondedicated standalone scanners (software-based image coregistration). Here, we focus on comparing hardwarebased versus software-based image coregistration for car-diac hybrid imaging and their respective advantages and drawbacks.
WHAT IS CARDIAC HYBRID IMAGING?The hallmark of hybrid imaging is the combined or fused imaging of two datasets, where both modalities contribute equally to image information. However, the term "hybrid imaging" has been used in other contexts, raising confusion about its exact meaning.Some authors have referred to the X-ray-based attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) as hybrid imaging. 6 However, in such a setting, CT images do not provide added anatomical or functional information, but are used merely to improve the image quality of the other modality (ie, PET or SPECT). In fact, whereas attenuation correction by 68 Germanium sources, as used in the previous generation of PET scanners, provided the same information, such imaging was not perceived as hybrid, probably because attenuation correction does not contribute to topographic image information. Similarly, the parametric maps obtained from low-dose CT do not provide image information beyond that n...