Two types of Hamiltonian hybrid quantum-classical theories are considered as potential models ofthe quantum measurement process. The two theories have the same Hamiltonian dynamics but differ in the association of states of the quantum system with states of the hybrid model. In the first type of association pure quantum states are modeled by pure states of the hybrid, while in the second type the pure quantum states are modeled by statistical mixtures of the hybrid pure states. It is shown that the second of the two theories describes correctly the quantum measurement while the first provides only an averaged description. The first phenomenological model of the measurement process in quantum mechanics (QM), which is mathematically explicit and rigorous, was given by von Neumann [1]. The model postulates mathematical form of the change undergone by the state vector of the system composed by the measurement apparatus (A) and the measured system (S), when an ideal measurement of a physical quantity, represented by a Hermitian operator, is performed. The type of change experienced by the system -\-apparatus (SA) state vector in the measurement process is called the collapse of tbe state vector and is qualitatively different from any other dynamical process occurring in an isolated quantum system. If the state vector is interpreted as a real property of the SA system, and with other standard axioms of the von Neumann type, the special status ofthe collapse process among all other physical processes demands an explanation. Many attempts have been made to provide at least an approximate description of the state vector collapse in terms of usual dynamical processes in a SA system [2,3]. One type of attempt to model quantum measurement, if not explain it, considers the SA system as a novel kind of so-called hybrid quantum-classical systems. Such models start with an isolated quantum system S and an isolated classical system A, which are then allowed to interact and form the hybrid SA system, with its own type of states and the corresponding hybrid dynamics. Hybrid systems are interesting independent of their application in modeling the measurement, and several hybrid theories have been proposed (for a recent review, see Ref.[4]). Some of the suggested hybrid theories are mathematically inconsistent, and "no-go" theorems have been formulated [5], suggesting that no consistent hybrid theory can be formulated. Nevertheless, mathematically consistent hybrid theories exist [4,6-8].The goal of this communication is to compare descriptions of the quantum measurement in two mathematically consistent theories of hybrid quantum-classical systems. The dynamics in the two theories is the same and is described in terms of Hamiltonian dynamical systems, as for example in Refs. [4,[9][10][11]. However, the association of states ofthe hybrid SA system with the states of the quantum SA system is different in the two hybrid theories, and due to this difference one of the hybrid theories gives a good model of the quantum *buric@ipb.ac.rs me...