2008
DOI: 10.1080/01431160802244268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid classification of Landsat data and GIS for land use/cover change analysis of the Bindura district, Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem was solved using a hybrid-supervised/unsupervised classification that was analyzed using Geographical Information System (GIS) algorithms that produced neighborhood and matricial representations [33].…”
Section: Hybrid-supervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem was solved using a hybrid-supervised/unsupervised classification that was analyzed using Geographical Information System (GIS) algorithms that produced neighborhood and matricial representations [33].…”
Section: Hybrid-supervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, remote sensing of human activities in Zimbabwe can provide a more effective mirror for the economic decline. A few studies of Zimbabwe on land cover change mapping [45] and human settlement detection [46] seem to have stronger link to the socioeconomic aspects. However, these works made use of medium or high resolution remote sensing imagery, which is too costly when applied in national scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One land cover study which attempts to map cropping areas of central Ethiopia achieved overall accuracy of 55%-74% for its agricultural classes that were differentiated based on intensity of cropping by supplementing wide area use of Landsat TM data with limited area use of 1-m resolution IKONOS imagery [17]. In a single district of Zimbabwe, an area of about 2000 km 2 , land cover mapping through a combined method of unsupervised and supervised classification schemes achieved 85% accuracy including within agriculture but much of that is large-scale commercial agriculture [18]. A dense time stack of imagery for a single year coupled with phenological curves fed into a decision tree was important in discerning irrigated from rainfed agriculture in West Africa, but there was still difficulty in separating rainfed agriculture from natural vegetation in the heterogeneous smallholder landscape [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%