Abstract:Multiple shifted images (MSIs) have been widely applied to many super-resolution mapping (SRM) approaches to improve the accuracy of fine-scale land-cover maps. Most SRM methods with MSIs involve two processes: subpixel sharpening and class allocation. Complementary information from the MSIs has been successfully adopted to produce soft attribute values of subpixels during the subpixel sharpening process. Such information, however, is not used in the second process of class allocation. In this paper, a new cla… Show more
“…(8) to maximize the soft class values of the subpixels within each object, subjected to the class proportional constraints of each object in Eq. (9). Note that only mixed objects perform this model whereas the pure object is directly assigned to the same land-cover class to its all subpixels for saving computation time.…”
Section: Determining the Optimal Land-cover Labels Of Subpixelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy (OA) metric was employed to quantitatively assess the accuracy of classified maps. Note that the calculation of OA in the first two experiment was only for mixed objects to avoid the influence of pure objects as pure objects provided no useful information in evaluating SRM method [9,29,49]. Both object-based hard and soft classifiers are used the k-nearest neighbor approach when classifying spectral remote sensing images in the three experiments [50].…”
Section: A Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, super resolution mapping (SRM) (also termed as subpixel mapping) technique is proposed as a promising solution to mixed pixels [4]. SRM fist disaggregates each coarse pixel in fractional images (i.e., the output of pixel-based soft classification) into fine subpixels and then determines where the subpixels of each land-cover class spatially distribute within a pixel [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Over the past decades, many SRM methods have been proposed.…”
“…(8) to maximize the soft class values of the subpixels within each object, subjected to the class proportional constraints of each object in Eq. (9). Note that only mixed objects perform this model whereas the pure object is directly assigned to the same land-cover class to its all subpixels for saving computation time.…”
Section: Determining the Optimal Land-cover Labels Of Subpixelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy (OA) metric was employed to quantitatively assess the accuracy of classified maps. Note that the calculation of OA in the first two experiment was only for mixed objects to avoid the influence of pure objects as pure objects provided no useful information in evaluating SRM method [9,29,49]. Both object-based hard and soft classifiers are used the k-nearest neighbor approach when classifying spectral remote sensing images in the three experiments [50].…”
Section: A Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, super resolution mapping (SRM) (also termed as subpixel mapping) technique is proposed as a promising solution to mixed pixels [4]. SRM fist disaggregates each coarse pixel in fractional images (i.e., the output of pixel-based soft classification) into fine subpixels and then determines where the subpixels of each land-cover class spatially distribute within a pixel [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Over the past decades, many SRM methods have been proposed.…”
“…The APP is an index with which to evaluate the areal spatial pattern, because most existing SPM methods are suited to areal features [16,18,24,25,40]. The APP is equal to the area of features with areal pattern, divided by the total area:…”
Section: Areal Pattern Proportionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy might decrease with increasing zoom factor [6,24,40,41], and therefore we are interested in establishing at which zoom factor the accuracy stabilizes.…”
Section: Spm Performance With Different Zoom Factorsmentioning
Abstract:Various subpixel mapping (SPM) methods have been proposed as downscaling techniques to reduce uncertainty in classifying mixed pixels. Such methods can provide category maps of a higher spatial resolution than the original input images. The aim of this study was to explore and validate the potential of SPM as an alternative method for obtaining land use/land cover (LULC) maps of regions where high-spatial-resolution LULC maps are unavailable. An experimental design was proposed to evaluate the feasibility of SPM for providing the alternative LULC maps. A case study was implemented in the Jingjinji region of China. SPM results for spatial resolutions of 500-100 m were derived from a single 1-km synthetic fraction image using two representative SPM methods. The 1-km synthetic fraction image was assumed to be error free. Accuracy assessment and analysis showed that overall accuracies of the SPM results were reduced from about 85% to 75% with increasing spatial resolution, and that producer's accuracies varied considerably from about 62% to 93%. SPM performed best when handling areal features in comparison with linear and point features. The highest accuracies were achieved for areas with the lowest complexity. The study concluded that the results from SPM could provide an alternative LULC data source with acceptable accuracy, especially in areas with low complexity and with a large proportion of areal features.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.