Hybrid cryptosystem for maintaining image integrity using biometric fingerprint

Dahake, Prashant; Nimbhorkar, S. U.

doi:10.1109/pervasive.2015.7087177

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other approaches (Meenakshi and Padmavathi, 2010;Filho et al, 2012;Nasir and Kuppuswamy, 2013;Le et al, 2014) analyze the security of the proposed techniques without providing detailed information on the recognition accuracy. Three other works (Butt and Damer, 2014;Nguyen et al, 2015;Dahake and Nimbhorkar, 2015) do not provide information on the recognition accuracy and security of the proposed techniques. This makes it difficult to access the suitability of the proposed approaches for practical situations.…”

Section: Open Issues and Challengesmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The scheme also provides improved authentication speed (can handle up to 624 bytes per second) and security of stored templates. Similarly, a technique based on key generation and encryption was proposed to provide secure transmission of mosaic image (Dahake and Nimbhorkar, 2015). The image is encrypted (prior to transmission) by using a key generated from fingerprint data.…”

Section: Hybrid Biometric Cryptosystemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cancelable and hybrid biometric cryptosystems: current directions and open research issues

Jegede

2017

Int. j. adv. appl. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cancelable and hybrid biometric cryptosystems are two techniques used to offer protection against the security and privacy challenges faced by users of biometric authentication systems. The main objective of this paper is to present a critical review of current and emerging trends as well as open research issues in cancellable and hybrid biometric systems. The study examines cancelable biometrics under two main categories, namely noninvertible transformation and biometric salting. It also explores hybrid cryptosystems as means of providing improved template security and user privacy. The review focusses on the modes of operation, performance accuracy, security and privacy of various types of cancellable and hybrid biometric cryptosystems. It also provides a more comprehensive survey of latest research works in cancellable and hybrid biometric cryptosystems than existing review papers in these fields. The paper will provide readers with up-to-date information on current directions and open research issues in cancelable and hybrid biometric cryptosystems.

show abstract