2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid (CT/MRI based) vs. MRI only based image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer: Dosimetry comparisons and clinical outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such overestimations may be improved by including information from 3D documentation of physical examinations and diagnostic MRI without applicator insertion before brachytherapy [ 32 , 33 ]. Moreover, a combination of MRI-based 3D IGBT for the first session and CT-based 3D IGBT for the subsequent sessions has yielded excellent LC and OS rates [ 34 ]. In the present study, CT-based 3D IGBT was performed, which was supported by gynecological examinations, ultrasound guidance, and MRI at diagnosis and within 1 week before the first session of brachytherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such overestimations may be improved by including information from 3D documentation of physical examinations and diagnostic MRI without applicator insertion before brachytherapy [ 32 , 33 ]. Moreover, a combination of MRI-based 3D IGBT for the first session and CT-based 3D IGBT for the subsequent sessions has yielded excellent LC and OS rates [ 34 ]. In the present study, CT-based 3D IGBT was performed, which was supported by gynecological examinations, ultrasound guidance, and MRI at diagnosis and within 1 week before the first session of brachytherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choong et al . [38] have reported results comparing this hybrid technique with IGBT planning based on MRI at each fraction, and showed that the 3-year local control and survival rates were similar. The dosimetry achieved and late toxicity were also similar between the two groups.…”
Section: Imaging – Mri/us/ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically, cervical cancer accounts for most of women cancers [1, 2]. In spite of current progressions in the diagnosis and treatment including operation intervention, chemo-/radiotherapy, the five years overall survival status remains about fifty percent because the diagnosis of most of cervical cancer patients are defined at a advanced stage, and patients had lymphatic metastasis of cervical cancer [3, 4]. Increasing evidence have demonstrated that many signaling pathways affected the development of cervical cancer, among the imbalance between oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes is responsible for the development of tumors [5], however the specific molecular mechanism of cervical cancer is not yet fully elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%