2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Differential Evolution Algorithm for Traveling Salesman Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LRT : length of the resulting tour, LOT : length of the optimal tour. Table 1 shows a comparison of the two proposed alternatives of the monarchy metaheuristic MN 1 and MN 2 and other methods in the literature that have used integer distances, the results of GA (genetic algorithm) and AMCPA (adaptive multicrossover population algorithm) were taken from [4], the results of HGA (hybrid genetic algorithm) were taken from [5], the results of HDE (hybrid differential evolution algorithm) and DPSO (discrete particle swam optimization) were taken from [6], and the results of SA (simulated annealing), ACO (ant colony optimization), and TPASHO (two-phase hybrid optimization algorithm) were taken from [7]. As seen in Table 1, the results produced by the proposed method are better than those of all the other methods for Eil101, Eil76, Eil51, and St70 test problems, and the optimum solutions are obtained for the Eil51 and St70 instances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LRT : length of the resulting tour, LOT : length of the optimal tour. Table 1 shows a comparison of the two proposed alternatives of the monarchy metaheuristic MN 1 and MN 2 and other methods in the literature that have used integer distances, the results of GA (genetic algorithm) and AMCPA (adaptive multicrossover population algorithm) were taken from [4], the results of HGA (hybrid genetic algorithm) were taken from [5], the results of HDE (hybrid differential evolution algorithm) and DPSO (discrete particle swam optimization) were taken from [6], and the results of SA (simulated annealing), ACO (ant colony optimization), and TPASHO (two-phase hybrid optimization algorithm) were taken from [7]. As seen in Table 1, the results produced by the proposed method are better than those of all the other methods for Eil101, Eil76, Eil51, and St70 test problems, and the optimum solutions are obtained for the Eil51 and St70 instances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this part, we will try to compare the results of the application of the RSO with the results of other more known metaheuristics. The results of ACO (ant colony optimization) were taken from (Bao, 2015), the results of ABC (artificial bee colony) (Gündüz et al, 2015), and the results of HA (Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X. Wang and Xu (2011)proposed hybrid DE Algorithm that uses hill climbing heuristic for solving traveling salesman problem.Gao andLiu (2011)developed a hybridization betweenthe artificial bee colony and DE algorithms.El Dor et al ( 2012) hybridized particle swarm optimization with DE for enhancing the algorithm. Cui et al(2013) proposed a hybrid differential evolution harmony search algorithm for numerical optimization problems.…”
Section: Hybridization With Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%