2018
DOI: 10.2172/1467230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Discrete Ordinates Solver for the Radiative Transport Equation using Second Order Finite Volume and Discontinuous Galerkin

Abstract: We propose a hybrid spatial discretization for the radiative transport equation that combines a second-order discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method and a second-order finite volume (FV) method. The strategy relies on a simple operator splitting that has been used previously to combine different angular discretizations. Unlike standard FV methods with upwind fluxes, the hybrid approach is able to accurately simulate problems in scattering dominated regimes. However, it requires less memory and yields a faster compu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DG method has been used to develop structure-preserving methods in a range of applications; see for example Zhang and Shu (2010b) and Wu and Tang (2016) for physical-constraint-preserving methods for the non-relativistic and relativistic Euler equations, respectively, Li and Xing (2018) for a steady-state preserving method for the Euler equations with gravitation, and Juno et al (2018) for an energy-conserving DG method for kinetic plasma simulations. We also mention the work of Heningburg and Hauck (2020), where DG and finite-volume methods are combined to a hybrid transport scheme that captures the diffusion limit and is more efficient in terms of memory usage and computational time than the corresponding DG-only scheme.…”
Section: Newtonian-gravity O(v/c) Finite-volume Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DG method has been used to develop structure-preserving methods in a range of applications; see for example Zhang and Shu (2010b) and Wu and Tang (2016) for physical-constraint-preserving methods for the non-relativistic and relativistic Euler equations, respectively, Li and Xing (2018) for a steady-state preserving method for the Euler equations with gravitation, and Juno et al (2018) for an energy-conserving DG method for kinetic plasma simulations. We also mention the work of Heningburg and Hauck (2020), where DG and finite-volume methods are combined to a hybrid transport scheme that captures the diffusion limit and is more efficient in terms of memory usage and computational time than the corresponding DG-only scheme.…”
Section: Newtonian-gravity O(v/c) Finite-volume Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.2. As demonstrated in [18], the inversion of the block L 00 in (3.22), rather than the full matrix L in (2.14), results in a significant savings in terms of floating point operations (and hence time-to-solution). This savings will be partially offset by the need to invert the matrix B 11 in (3.20).…”
Section: Low-memory Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we apply the reconstruction suggested in [18] to recover slopes for simplicity, although in general other upwind approaches can also be used 7 . For illustration, we consider a uniform Cartesian mesh on [0, 1] × [0, 1] × [0, 1].…”
Section: Reconstructed Low-memory Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DG method has been used to develop structure-preserving methods in a range of applications; see for example Zhang and Shu (2010b) and Wu and Tang (2016) for physical-constraint-preserving methods for the non-relativistic and relativistic Euler equations, respectively, Li and Xing (2018) for a steady-state preserving method for the Euler equations with gravitation, and Juno et al (2018) for an energy-conserving DG method for kinetic plasma simulations. We also mention the work of Heningburg and Hauck (2020), where DG and finite-volume methods are combined to a hybrid transport scheme that captures the diffusion limit and is more efficient in terms of memory usage and computational time than the corresponding DG-only scheme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%