2015
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid External Fixation for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) 43-C Tibial Plafond Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, 35% of the patients in the group with distal fractures demonstrated moderate-to-severe signs of osteoarthritis at follow-up, which is comparable to previous studies reporting on osteoarthritis following distal tibial fractures [37]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the present study, 35% of the patients in the group with distal fractures demonstrated moderate-to-severe signs of osteoarthritis at follow-up, which is comparable to previous studies reporting on osteoarthritis following distal tibial fractures [37]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The use of external fixation is widely adopted in current practice to manage these very challenging fractures. The time to union between these two methods of fixation is comparable with reported higher rates of superficial infection and non-union with external fixation [ 5 - 6 ]. Recent evidence has also shown a comparable ankle range of motion, arthritis, and hindfoot scores between the two methods, confirming that both are reasonable management options in this injury type [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Regarding union rates, external fixation has been associated with very high union rates in the management of acute tibial fractures [ 5 ]. The use of open reduction and bone grafting in conjunction with external fixation has also been shown to impart very high union rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%