2022 2nd International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/esmarta56775.2022.9935422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Feature Extraction MFCC and Feature Selection CNN for Speaker Identification Using CNN: A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MFCCs have been a common choice for feature extraction due to their effectiveness in clean speech conditions. However, their robustness in the presence of reverberation and noise is a subject of ongoing investigation [ 3 , 6 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MFCCs have been a common choice for feature extraction due to their effectiveness in clean speech conditions. However, their robustness in the presence of reverberation and noise is a subject of ongoing investigation [ 3 , 6 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the system denies access to an enrolled speaker’s utterance, the speaker is classified as an impostor. Consequently, SV systems play a crucial role in security applications, thwarting unauthorized entry by individuals [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The paper also addresses the challenges faced by speaker recognition systems, including domain robustness, the impact of noise, and limitations in neural network architecture. It highlights the importance of utilizing different CNN architectures, feature extraction techniques, and training methods to enhance system performance [9]. In summary, the proposed methodology focuses on overcoming research gaps related to small datasets, loss functions, acoustic conditions, and domain robustness in speaker recognition.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%