2017
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2017.2700865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Modified Iterative Fourier Transform Algorithm for Large Thinned Array Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main‐lobe width is 0.0101 (0.577°). Compared with the other algorithms, shown in Table 1, the PSLL obtained by the proposed method is 1.99 dB lower than −22.09 dB by GA [1], 1.16 dB lower than −22.92 dB by IFT [7], 1.03 lower than −23.05 dB by ADSGA [12] and 0.61 dB lower than −23.47 dB by HGAMIFT [9]. What is more, the main‐lobe width obtained by the proposed method is about the same as the other methods or even more narrow.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main‐lobe width is 0.0101 (0.577°). Compared with the other algorithms, shown in Table 1, the PSLL obtained by the proposed method is 1.99 dB lower than −22.09 dB by GA [1], 1.16 dB lower than −22.92 dB by IFT [7], 1.03 lower than −23.05 dB by ADSGA [12] and 0.61 dB lower than −23.47 dB by HGAMIFT [9]. What is more, the main‐lobe width obtained by the proposed method is about the same as the other methods or even more narrow.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cases of different sizes and fill factors, the proposed method performs much better solutions compared with GA, IFT, ADSGA and HGAMIFT. It can be concluded that the proposed method gets results ∼3–4 dB lower than that by GA [1], ∼2–3 dB lower than that by IFT [7] and ADSGA [12], ∼0.3–1 dB lower than that by HGAMIFT [9].…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an important research direction of antenna arrays, the theory of array synthesis has attracted more and more attention because it can be applied to customizing the patterns and impedance matching. Therefore, many optimization methods based on analytical methods [1]- [6], stochastic algorithms [7]- [10], convex optimization [11]- [13] and hybrid methods [14]- [17] have been proposed for array synthesis problems in recent years. The above methods have shown excellent performances in many array synthesis problems; however, they all consider the elements in the arrays to be ideal models and the mutual coupling effects among the elements are ignored, which could cause two problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most notable techniques include genetic algorithm (GA) [16], [17], iterative Fourier transform (IFT) [10], [18], particle swarm (PS) [19]- [21], multi-level branch-and-bound (B&B) [22] matrix pencil method [23], Compressive sensing [24], [25], invasive weed (IW) [26], ant colony [27] and so on. A number of hybrid schemes of multiple approaches were also proposed [28], [29]. It is noteworthy that although these approaches show effectiveness in reproducing the desired/reference patterns, some do not work for asymmetrical beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%