2015
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/8/083022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid integral-differential simulator of EM force interactions/scenario-assessment tool with pre-computed influence matrix in applications to ITER

Abstract: A necessity to address a wide spectrum of engineering problems in ITER determined the need for efficient tools for modeling of the magnetic environment and force interactions between the main components of the magnet system. The assessment of the operating window for the machine, determined by the electro-magnetic (EM) forces, and the check of feasibility of particular scenarios play an important role for ensuring the safety of exploitation. Such analysis-powered prevention of damages forms an element of the M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition and its consequence F(w−) = 0, where F is the same integral as in (1), but taken on w−, are automatically satisfied when B is found in solving the full equilibrium problem with proper matching of the internal and external solutions. On the contrary, when the plasma is introduced as a rigid ring [3,4,8] or wire [36][37][38] or a set of filaments [21,22,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] with a current J, the tilt and CQ treated as dJ/dt = 0 result in a magnetic field different from B needed for the gaseous (absolutely non-rigid!) plasma equilibrium.…”
Section: Models For the Sideways Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition and its consequence F(w−) = 0, where F is the same integral as in (1), but taken on w−, are automatically satisfied when B is found in solving the full equilibrium problem with proper matching of the internal and external solutions. On the contrary, when the plasma is introduced as a rigid ring [3,4,8] or wire [36][37][38] or a set of filaments [21,22,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] with a current J, the tilt and CQ treated as dJ/dt = 0 result in a magnetic field different from B needed for the gaseous (absolutely non-rigid!) plasma equilibrium.…”
Section: Models For the Sideways Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of i and/or B w is a separate electromagnetic task [35][36][37][38][39], the main difficulty of which comes from the plasmawall coupling through (3) at S pl because the shape and position of the latter must also react to the plasma changes. Incorporation of this coupling [39,40] is mandatory in the task [19,21,24,34], it leads to an essential difference in the disruption forces from those calculated for the plasma replaced by one [41][42][43] or several [11,[44][45][46][47][48][49] solid current rings. The analysis below is based on the results presented in [39,40] for the large-aspect-ratio model with a circular plasma and almost coaxial wall.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 2µ 0 p ψ m ≡ B 2 p wall (45) and the other term represents the contribution from the toroidal field B t :…”
Section: Magnetic Pressure and Local Forcementioning
confidence: 99%