1997
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid ℓ1/ℓ2 minimization with applications to tomography

Abstract: Least squares or [Formula: see text] solutions of seismic inversion and tomography problems tend to be very sensitive to data points with large errors. The [Formula: see text] minimization for 1 ≤ p < 2 gives more robust solutions, but usually with higher computational cost. Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) gives efficient approximate solutions to these [Formula: see text] problems. We apply IRLS to a hybrid [Formula: see text] minimization problem that behaves like an [Formula: see text] fit for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cause of this problem is the lack of low frequencies in seismic data. Alternatives for the least-squares objective function with the L2-norm (Tarantola and Valette, 1982), such as the Huber norm (Huber, 1973;Guitton and Symes, 2003) or hybrid approaches (Bube and Langan, 1997;Brossier et al, 2010), are more robust in the presence of large isolated and non-Gaussian errors, but still suffer from the same cycle skipping problem as observed with the L2-norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of this problem is the lack of low frequencies in seismic data. Alternatives for the least-squares objective function with the L2-norm (Tarantola and Valette, 1982), such as the Huber norm (Huber, 1973;Guitton and Symes, 2003) or hybrid approaches (Bube and Langan, 1997;Brossier et al, 2010), are more robust in the presence of large isolated and non-Gaussian errors, but still suffer from the same cycle skipping problem as observed with the L2-norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that large residuals contribute very little to the search direction as the optimization proceeds as a result of this down-weighing. Functionally, such downweighing strongly resembles the IRLS method (see for example Bube and Langan (1997)); however, in our context the down-weighing arises naturally, deriving from the gradient of the MAP optimization problem (7).…”
Section: Student's T-density and Fwi Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Artifacts' refer to coherent or systematic (non-random) events that arise because of shortcomings in the forward modeling. The distinction between 'errors' and 'artifacts' can become blurred-for example, multiples in the data, which motivated robust methods in tomography (Bube and Langan (1997)), can actually aid recovery once modeling tools are available to appropriately use them in the inversion process. Other examples of such systematic events include out of plane scattering when working with 2D seismic data, and using acoustic PDEs for the forward model where the elastic or anisotropic models could be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of p was chosen after some numerical experimentation to eliminate random oscillations of the water surface while still capturing aperiodic and low-frequency variations, such as due to tides or local gradients in bathymetry. Alternatively, an error tolerance based on measurement accuracy could be used instead of a constant smoothing parameter, or L 1 /L 2 minimizations could be performed to down-weight erroneous data (e.g., Bube and Langan 1997), although these tests were not carried out. Once smoothed, the data points were sorted according to the along-transect direction before gridding.…”
Section: Matte Et Al Rtk Gps/adcp Measurements In Tidal Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%