2020
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.5713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid model of generative adversarial network and Takagi‐Sugeno for multidimensional incomplete hydrological big data prediction

Abstract: Summary The processing of rainfall‐runoff transmission in the catchment area is a very complex phenomenon, such as temporal and spatial changes of the catchment characteristics and uncertainties of rainfall patterns. To handle this challenge, data‐driven hydrologic models emerge rapidly for the rainfall runoff prediction. However, the incomplete hydrological data constrain the development of digital hydrologic model. This article proposes a rainfall‐runoff prediction method of coupling generative adversarial n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This elucidates a significant reason why GRU appl garner less attention than LSTM in hydrological forecasting. At present, the applic GRUs in hydrological forecasting in the literature is mainly based on basic alg [74,94,95], although there are also many improved versions of the GRU, such as t rectional GRU [122,123] or versions with added attention mechanisms [124,125] types of DL algorithms, such as GANs, ResNets, and GNNs, have been utilized in logical forecasting, yielding more satisfactory prediction outcomes [107,110,113,1 For example, the emergence of the GAN is significant for dealing with missing hy ical data. However, the number of related research works on these topics remains particularly in terms of the thorough adaptation of algorithms to this research con Based on the above literature review, Table 3 lists a comparison of different variants of GRUs or other models for hydrological forecasting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This elucidates a significant reason why GRU appl garner less attention than LSTM in hydrological forecasting. At present, the applic GRUs in hydrological forecasting in the literature is mainly based on basic alg [74,94,95], although there are also many improved versions of the GRU, such as t rectional GRU [122,123] or versions with added attention mechanisms [124,125] types of DL algorithms, such as GANs, ResNets, and GNNs, have been utilized in logical forecasting, yielding more satisfactory prediction outcomes [107,110,113,1 For example, the emergence of the GAN is significant for dealing with missing hy ical data. However, the number of related research works on these topics remains particularly in terms of the thorough adaptation of algorithms to this research con Based on the above literature review, Table 3 lists a comparison of different variants of GRUs or other models for hydrological forecasting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the application of GRUs in hydrological forecasting in the literature is mainly based on basic algorithms [74,94,95], although there are also many improved versions of the GRU, such as the bidirectional GRU [122,123] or versions with added attention mechanisms [124,125]. Other types of DL algorithms, such as GANs, ResNets, and GNNs, have been utilized in hydrological forecasting, yielding more satisfactory prediction outcomes [107,110,113,117,118]. For example, the emergence of the GAN is significant for dealing with missing hydrological data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several examples show the advantages of incorporating GAN models in hydrological classification [267][268][269] or combining it with autoencoder [270]. Integrating GAN with an LSTM network model [271][272][273]; combining GAN with an ANN fuzzy model [274] was also found to improve the automated hydrological and weather prediction using satellite data.…”
Section: Automation Of Hydrological and Fluvial System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%