2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid models as transdisciplinary research enablers

Abstract: Highlights Our work is an extension of recent research efforts in Hybrid Simulation. We focus on Hybrid Modelling and the use of cross-disciplinary approaches. We present a framework for the synthesis of discipline-specific approaches. The framework aims to support cross-disciplinary research within the M&S community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to hybrid simulation (HS), which refers to the combined application of discrete and continuous simulation approaches such as SD, DES, and ABS to a single simulation study (see Brailsford et al 40 for a recent review of literature on this topic), HM is broader in scope. HM advocates the use of cross-disciplinary approaches, including interdisciplinary research paradigms, frameworks, methodologies, techniques, and tools 10 to one or more stages of a simulation study (e.g., conceptual modeling, model implementation, model execution, and scenario development) with the objective of creating the best possible representation of the system of interest. 41 Mustafee and Powell 24 in their paper titled “ From Hybrid Simulation to Hybrid Systems Modelling ” outline the difference between HS and HM approaches and present a unifying HS–HM conceptual representation.…”
Section: Hybrid Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to hybrid simulation (HS), which refers to the combined application of discrete and continuous simulation approaches such as SD, DES, and ABS to a single simulation study (see Brailsford et al 40 for a recent review of literature on this topic), HM is broader in scope. HM advocates the use of cross-disciplinary approaches, including interdisciplinary research paradigms, frameworks, methodologies, techniques, and tools 10 to one or more stages of a simulation study (e.g., conceptual modeling, model implementation, model execution, and scenario development) with the objective of creating the best possible representation of the system of interest. 41 Mustafee and Powell 24 in their paper titled “ From Hybrid Simulation to Hybrid Systems Modelling ” outline the difference between HS and HM approaches and present a unifying HS–HM conceptual representation.…”
Section: Hybrid Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our HM methodology leverages the strengths of these individual (and interdisciplinary) techniques. 10 It provides a solution that best applies to the CFTP scenario that we present in this paper. The hybrid method is used to model an urban area that has a number of logistics clusters serving as hubs for various transportation networks with multiple warehouses operated by e-commerce businesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increases the complexity of analysis and the range of possible futures to explore. The integrated tools identified above are useful for finding knowledge patterns that can be used to better focus assessment communication and discussion (Mattor et al 2014;Tolk et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A connected system may need its network modeled as well as its environment since a CPS always interacts with the outside world. Twenty-six (17%) MPM papers reported modeling all four main components of CPS [25,28,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Most frequently (29 (18%)), the papers modeled the hardware, software, and network of the system (see Fig.…”
Section: Reported Modeled Components In Mpm4cpsmentioning
confidence: 99%