2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Monte Carlo approach for accurate and efficient shutdown dose rate calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conjunction with the 10% stated experimental uncertainty, it is clear that we should regard the simulation results as rough estimates and that it would be unreasonable to expect perfect agreement with experiment given the magnitude of the uncertainties. Further validation against other experiments, such as ones performed on JET [14], would provide further confidence in the code system and is recommended as future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conjunction with the 10% stated experimental uncertainty, it is clear that we should regard the simulation results as rough estimates and that it would be unreasonable to expect perfect agreement with experiment given the magnitude of the uncertainties. Further validation against other experiments, such as ones performed on JET [14], would provide further confidence in the code system and is recommended as future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For these reasons, we consider an SDR calculation as the 'measuring stick' for the capabilities of a nuclear analysis toolchain in the design of fusion energy systems. There are two primary methods for performing SDR calculations: the Rigorous 2-Step (R2S) method [11] and the Direct 1-Step (D1S) method [12,13] (several recent articles have proposed new methods [14,15] that improve upon R2S and D1S but have not yet been widely adopted to our knowledge). The R2S and D1S methods each have their own advantages and limitations, but both have been used for large-scale SDR calculations in support of ITER, JET, and other fusion experiments [11,[16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fusion reactors, both of these assumptions are met as most of the materials are considered to exhibit low burnup [4].…”
Section: Superposition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But its computational complexity rises with the complexity of the input model. In this paper we discuss the approach based on the assumption that a decay gamma source can be determined with linear superposition of the impact from different bins in the neutron flux energy distribution [4]. This assumption is based on the fact that mutual influence of neutron radiation in different energy ranges is negligible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'on-the-fly' GVR is now an advanced technology used for accelerating the particle transport and has been widely used in CFETR nuclear analysis [9]. The sub-voxel PyNE R2S [10] and NASCA [11] were developed for the SDDR with full validation work and they have been applied to the CFETR calculation. This paper next gives a brief introduction to the activities in the development of the cosVMPT conversion tool and 'on-the-fly' variance reduction technology and their application to CFETR nuclear analysis.…”
Section: Code Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%