Hybrid MPC: An Application to Semiactive Control of Structures

Elhaddad, Wael; Johnson, E. A.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6555-3_4

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Semi-active Mass Dampers1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the case of wind excitation, it was found that the proposed controller outperformed a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controller. Elhaddad and Johnson (2013) studied the implementation of a hybrid MPC algorithm on semi-active control applications. The authors stated that the hybrid MPC is more suitable for semi-active control since, it can accurately model the passivity constraints by using auxiliary variables into the system model.…”

Section: Semi-active Mass Dampersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Passive, semi-active, active and hybrid mass dampers: A literature review with associated applications on building-like structures

Koutsoloukas

Nikitas

Aristidou

2022

Developments in the Built Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Semi-active Mass Dampersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Passive, semi-active, active and hybrid mass dampers: A literature review with associated applications on building-like structures

Koutsoloukas

Nikitas

Aristidou

2022

Developments in the Built Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robust structural control of a real high‐rise tower equipped with a hybrid mass damper

Koutsoloukas

Nikitas

Aristidou

2022

Structural Design Tall Build

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, the robust control of a real high-rise tower is studied, using a newly proposed, in the structural control field, Robust Model Predictive Control scheme (RMPC). Two RMPC controllers were designed considering either displacement mitigation (RMPC 1 ) or power consumption efficiency (RMPC 2 ).The two controllers were compared to the benchmark, robustness-wise, H ∞ control scheme to demonstrate their relative performance. A number of stiffness and damping uncertainty scenarios were designed based on a broad study of the relevant literature, in order to estimate the robustness of each of the three controllers. In all scenarios, variable actuator uncertainty of AE5% was introduced. It was found that all controllers are effective in controlling the tower and demonstrate robustness against parametric and actuator uncertainties with different relative merits over each other. Indicatively, when considering root-mean-square (RMS) and peak displacement and acceleration reduction, the H ∞ had an average performance reduction of 24%, the RMPC 1 31% and the RMPC 2 28% against their uncontrolled equivalent.

show abstract

Hybrid MPC: An Application to Semiactive Control of Structures

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

Passive, semi-active, active and hybrid mass dampers: A literature review with associated applications on building-like structures

Passive, semi-active, active and hybrid mass dampers: A literature review with associated applications on building-like structures

Robust structural control of a real high‐rise tower equipped with a hybrid mass damper

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About