2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid physics and data-driven modeling for unconventional field development and its application to US onshore basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For unconventional resources, Xue et al (2023) proposed a deep learning model driven jointly by the decline curve analysis model and production data for the production performance prediction of tight gas wells. Park et al (2021) developed a hybrid model by combining physics and data-driven approach for optimum unconventional field development. The existing methods typically require labeled data, particularly the precise solution of PDEs.…”
Section: Data and Physics Jointly Driven Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unconventional resources, Xue et al (2023) proposed a deep learning model driven jointly by the decline curve analysis model and production data for the production performance prediction of tight gas wells. Park et al (2021) developed a hybrid model by combining physics and data-driven approach for optimum unconventional field development. The existing methods typically require labeled data, particularly the precise solution of PDEs.…”
Section: Data and Physics Jointly Driven Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And these models do not take into account the physical law of seepage in tight gas reservoirs. In order to overcome the disadvantage of a pure data-driven model's adaptability, PARK [31] proposed a seepage model based on the physical model and mixed data-driven model in 2020. The results show that, even if the amount of data is reduced, the addition of the physical model can still maintain the high accuracy of the hybrid model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research of the above two scholars [31,32] shows that the combined use of a physical model and data-driven model can increase the prediction accuracy of the model and improve the generalization ability and anti-interference ability of the pure data-driven model. This paper combines the traditional decline curve model with the neural network of the data-driven model, and embeds the decline curve model into the optimization and adjustment of the data-driven model through driving and stimulating in the process of neural network learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jagtap et al [38] proposed a conservative physics-informed neural network (cPINN) for solving nonlinear PDEs by decomposing the computational domain into different sub-domains and enforcing the flux continuity in the strong form along the sub-domain interfaces. Park et al [39] constructed a hybrid model for optimum unconventional field development by combining unconventional reservoir uncalibrated priors and data generated by a numerical simulator. To solve the two-phase immersible flow problem governed by the Buckley-Leverett equation [40,41], they used physics-informed neural networks and obtained a physical solution by adding a diffusion term or an observational amount to the PDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%