2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-020-02242-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid sequencing resolves two germline ultra-complex chromosomal rearrangements consisting of 137 breakpoint junctions in a single carrier

Abstract: Chromoanagenesis is a genomic event responsible for the formation of complex structural chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs). Germline chromoanagenesis is rare and the majority of reported cases are associated with an affected phenotype. Here, we report a healthy female carrying two de novo CCRs involving chromosomes 4, 19, 21 and X and chromosomes 7 and 11, respectively, with a total of 137 breakpoint junctions (BPJs). We characterized the CCRs using a hybrid-sequencing approach, combining short-read sequencing,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This insertion was missed by CMA, WES, and WGS [ 55 ]. Therefore, it is important to be cognizant of the complementary nature of different genomic technologies [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This insertion was missed by CMA, WES, and WGS [ 55 ]. Therefore, it is important to be cognizant of the complementary nature of different genomic technologies [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we present a patient with Coffin-Siris syndrome 1 (CSS1) and multiple inversions affecting a single chromosome. Complex structural variants have been shown to present a challenge for detection as well as molecular and genomic characterization partly due to the inability to properly phase detected variants, as well as subsequent clinical interpretation of potential contribution of variant effects to observed clinical phenotype(s) (Grochowski et al, 2018;Eisfeldt et al, 2020;Plesser Duvdevani et al, 2020). To experimentally dissect the genomic architecture of the rearranged chromosome 6 of this patient, and to explore whether genes involved in the rearrangement contributed to the observed clinical traits, we employed several technologies including karyotyping (Gbanding), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative PCR (qPCR), aCGH, WGS, and genomic optical mapping in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth case (case 2 in [ 8 ]) is a complex translocation between chromosomes 1, 5, and 10, whereas chromosome 10 carries an additional deletion (green). (E) Chromoplexy: the last case [ 9 ] is a highly complex rearrangement with 137 breakpoints affecting chromosomes 4, 7, 11,19, 21, and X. Abbreviations: aCGH, array comparative genomic hybridization; der, derivative chromosome; chr, chromosome; GS, genome sequencing; Jct, junction; SINE, short interspersed nuclear element.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, CGR breakpoints were inferred using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multi-color banding, as well as karyotyping and chromosomal microarray (CMA) [6]. Because genome sequencing (GS) methodologies have increased our ability to detect and interpret complex genomic events, a growing number of reports of clinically relevant CGRs with an unexpected level of complexity have been published in the scientific literature [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Hence, CGRs, that were once presumed to be 'ultra-rare' occurrences may be more common than originally thought.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%