2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid symplectic integrators for planetary dynamics

Abstract: Hybrid symplectic integrators such as MERCURY are widely used to simulate complex dynamical phenomena in planetary dynamics that could otherwise not be investigated. A hybrid integrator achieves high accuracy during close encounters by using a high order integration scheme for the duration of the encounter while otherwise using a standard 2nd order Wisdom-Holman scheme, thereby optimizing both speed and accuracy. In this paper we reassess the criteria for choosing the switching function that determines which p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This ensures that that |H int | ≤ |H Kep |, even during a close encounter (for a detailed explanation, refer to Chambers (1999)). Nevertheless, the choice of K is an open debate on how the integrator keeps its symplecticity (Hernandez 2019; Rein et al 2019) about the switchover function and its expression is discussed in Sect. 5.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures that that |H int | ≤ |H Kep |, even during a close encounter (for a detailed explanation, refer to Chambers (1999)). Nevertheless, the choice of K is an open debate on how the integrator keeps its symplecticity (Hernandez 2019; Rein et al 2019) about the switchover function and its expression is discussed in Sect. 5.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases with close encounters between planets, the motion will no longer be nearly Keplerian, and Kepler splittings will yield large errors. In cases where such close encounters are rare, hybrid integrators are powerful tools (Duncan et al 1998;Chambers 1999;Rein et al 2019c). In REBOUND, the MERCURIUS integrator retains efficiency by using a Kepler splitting when possible, and switches to an adaptive, high-accuracy integration with IAS15 for particles undergoing close encounters (Rein et al 2019c).…”
Section: Which Integrator To Use?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIMULATING DYNAMICAL LIFETIME Determining the total mass loss possible for different volatiles requires knowledge of the dynamical lifetime of 2014 OG 392 in the Centaur region (where both perihelion distance and semi-major axis are between 5 and 30 au). To this end we made use of the REBOUND N -body integrator to model the orbits of 2014 OG 392 and giant planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune (Rein et al 2019). We also carried out 25 simulations of 2014 OG 392 , each with an orbital clone derived from the orbital uncertainties published by the Minor Planet Center.…”
Section: Followup Observingmentioning
confidence: 99%