2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04915-7_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Versus Pure-LES Models Comparison for Subcritical Cylinder Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Germano-like dynamic version of this approach which dynamically adapts the model constant was later proposed in [23]. This methodology has been applied to study the aerodynamics of bluff bodies in a number of works [66,56,38]. On the other hand, the VMS method developed in [43] employs a stabilised FEM based on a Galerkin/least-squares (GLS) approach to discretize the compressible N-S equations in entropy variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Germano-like dynamic version of this approach which dynamically adapts the model constant was later proposed in [23]. This methodology has been applied to study the aerodynamics of bluff bodies in a number of works [66,56,38]. On the other hand, the VMS method developed in [43] employs a stabilised FEM based on a Galerkin/least-squares (GLS) approach to discretize the compressible N-S equations in entropy variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%