Hybrid Working Method: An Integrative Review

Ateeq, Karamath

doi:10.1109/icbats54253.2022.9759041

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Selçuk Yeke / Cem Güney Özveren Individual and team performance, productivity, work-life balance, positive and negative work-home interactions, and employee retention may be enhanced by hybrid work that combines work from the office and home. To thrive in a challenging environment, businesses should promote policies that allow employees to work from home and change their workplace cultures (Ateeq, 2022). Employees who work in a hybrid model rate the experience positively, with roughly 75% saying it has improved their job satisfaction.…”

Section: Hybrid Work Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enabling the Management of Diverse Employees in the Hybrid Work Model: A Qualitative Study

Yeke.,

Güney Özveren

2024

RBGN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Hybrid Work Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enabling the Management of Diverse Employees in the Hybrid Work Model: A Qualitative Study

Yeke.,

Güney Özveren

2024

RBGN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Here we are extending their potential beyond mere substitutes for integration or segmentation as fixed preferences. For example, researchers on hybridity in emphasising the breaking down of boundaries seem to then position this as an unvarying general way of working (e.g., Ateeq, 2022; Zamani et al, 2022). Here, we seek instead to position hybridity as a situated and dynamic practice.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agentic interplay between hybridity and liminality in contemporary boundary work

Chamakiotis,

Symon,

Whiting

2023

Information Systems Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no doubt that digital technologies have an impact on boundary work, that is, the practices individuals develop to work up boundaries between ‘work’ and ‘life’. However, related research is still dominated by the integration–segmentation framework which may restrict our understanding of contemporary practice. To address this limitation, we use the concepts of hybridity (fusion) and liminality (in‐betweenness) in combination to explore how their interplay may promote more nuanced accounts of how individuals work up their boundaries in contemporary everyday life. Our analysis of video diaries and follow‐up interviews undertaken by 30 UK‐based workers reveals an ‘agentic interplay’ of hybridity and liminality that is understood as an ongoing dynamic practice, sometimes enabling and sometimes undermining desired boundary work outcomes. We make three contributions, collectively offering a critical advancement in the work–life debate and the hybridity and liminality literatures: (a) further developing an understanding of boundary work as situated, creative and dynamic; (b) unpacking the agentic potential of the ‘black box’ of the hybridity–liminality interplay; and (c) expanding current understandings and applications of the concepts of hybridity and liminality.

show abstract

“…Though the phenomenon of hybrid working model has been a topical area, the empirical studies carried out in the literature are not sufficient to explain the adoption behavior of the employees and organization as there are some inconsistencies in the findings (Ateeq, 2022). Though many studies conducted to explain the hybrid working model adoption behavior (Iqbal, Khalid, & Barykin, 2021;Lenka, 2021;Skountridaki, Marks, & Mallett, 2021;Williamson, & Colley, 2022), still determinant's of intention to adopt HWM by executive level employees seems to be a grey area that is open for further studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drivers of intention to adopt hybrid working model: Evidence from executives and above level employees in the selected apparel manufacturing enterprises in Sri Lanka

Liyanage¹,

Galhena²

2022

J. Mgt. Matters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hybrid working arrangement received significant popularity during the post COVID -19 era as travel restrictions and social distancing moved remote working from an option to a necessity. Employees generally resist accepting changes as they are willing to stick with the status quo which is more comfortable. Thus, stimulating employees for adopting a hybrid working model becomes a challenging task and scholars' and practitioners' attention is received on the phenomenon of hybrid working model adoption behaviors of the organization and employees. However, the phenomenon is underexplored in the context of an emerging economy. This study aims at identifying the determinants of intention to adopt hybrid working model by the executive and above-level employees of the Sri Lankan apparel industry. The model was developed using the UTAUT model. Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire from the sample of 101 executives and above-level employees from the three leading apparel companies in Sri Lanka. A stratified sampling technique was used while the list of employee details provided by the administrative officers of the three apparel firms was taken as the sample frame of the study. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis and the findings revealed that performance expectancy; effort expectancy, and social influence explained the intention to adopt the hybrid working model. This study contributes to the theory by enhancing the understanding of HWM adoption behavior of employees in developing economies as the study identifies drivers of HWM adoption behavior of the executives and above-level employees in the apparel sector specifically in Sri Lanka. The study found that the UTAUT model explains only 38 percent of the variance of the intention to adopt HWM. This indicates that some variables which have not been specified in the model have an impact on determining the HWM adoption behavior of the employees. Thus, future studies are opened up for further development of the research model.

show abstract

Hybrid Working Method: An Integrative Review

Cited by 8 publications

References 25 publications

Enabling the Management of Diverse Employees in the Hybrid Work Model: A Qualitative Study

Enabling the Management of Diverse Employees in the Hybrid Work Model: A Qualitative Study

Agentic interplay between hybridity and liminality in contemporary boundary work

Drivers of intention to adopt hybrid working model: Evidence from executives and above level employees in the selected apparel manufacturing enterprises in Sri Lanka

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About