2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-007-0609-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridisation processes in sympatric populations of pines Pinus sylvestris L., P. mugo Turra and P. uliginosa Neumann

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A lack of hybrids from crossings between P. mugo as a maternal and P. sylvestris as a paternal tree, but putative hybrid individuals from reverse crossing combinations (with P. mugo as a pollen donor), were found based on a joint analysis of cpDNA, isozymes, and phenotypic characteristics of trees (Wachowiak and Prus-Głowacki 2008) and at nuclear genes in a P. sylvestris and P. mugo population (Kormutak et al 2014). Cryptic hybrids between P. sylvestris and P. uncinata were found in the sympatric populations of the species (Jasińska et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lack of hybrids from crossings between P. mugo as a maternal and P. sylvestris as a paternal tree, but putative hybrid individuals from reverse crossing combinations (with P. mugo as a pollen donor), were found based on a joint analysis of cpDNA, isozymes, and phenotypic characteristics of trees (Wachowiak and Prus-Głowacki 2008) and at nuclear genes in a P. sylvestris and P. mugo population (Kormutak et al 2014). Cryptic hybrids between P. sylvestris and P. uncinata were found in the sympatric populations of the species (Jasińska et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Jasińska et al 2010;Wachowiak and Prus-Głowacki 2008). These taxa differ from each other in phenotype, geographical distribution, and ecology, in particular for traits related to dehydrative stress and temperature (Critchfield and Little 1966).…”
Section: Communicated By F Gugerlimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridization occurs in situations of sympatry and parapatry, often following range shifts and secondary contact between closely related and formerly allopatric species (Song et al, 2002(Song et al, , 2003Wachowiak and Prus-G"owacki, 2008). Hybridization can result in introgression of alleles across species boundaries and sometimes the origin of a new introgressant lineage (Currat et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a small but increasing number of cases has been documented recently across a range of plant, animal and fungal taxa (Gross and Rieseberg, 2005;Mallet, 2007;Abbott et al, 2010). It is well known that many closely related pine species hybridize, producing fertile and vigorous hybrids that combine morphological traits and/or genetic components of both parental species (Mirov, 1967;Wachowiak and Prus-G"owacki, 2008). Although several Asian pine species are thought to be of hybrid origin (Mirov, 1967), only Pinus densata has been rigorously analyzed and shown to be the homoploid hybrid of Pinus tabulaeformis and Pinus yunnanensis (Wang et al, 1990;Song et al, 2002Song et al, , 2003Song et al, , 2011Ma et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation