2011
DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2011.640899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridization between Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout and Rainbow Trout in the Upper Snake River Basin, Wyoming

Abstract: Human‐induced hybridization between fish populations and species is a major threat to aquatic biodiversity worldwide and is particularly relevant to management of the subspecies of cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii. The upper Snake River basin in Wyoming contains one of the largest remaining populations of Yellowstone cutthroat trout O. clarkii bouvieri, a subspecies of special concern throughout its range; however, little is known about levels of hybridization between Yellowstone cutthroat trout and exotic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although hybridization dynamics in westslope cutthroat trout have been extensively studied (e.g., Allendorf & Leary, 1988, ; Muhlfeld et al, , , ; Bennett, Olson, Kershner, & Corbett, ; Hohenlohe et al, ; Loxterman et al, ; Kovach et al, ; Young et al, ), relatively little work has focused on Yellowstone cutthroat trout hybridization (but see Kovach et al, ; Ostberg et al, , and others). It is an open question to what extent hybridization dynamics are consistent or variable across hybridizing pairs of species or subspecies within a genus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hybridization dynamics in westslope cutthroat trout have been extensively studied (e.g., Allendorf & Leary, 1988, ; Muhlfeld et al, , , ; Bennett, Olson, Kershner, & Corbett, ; Hohenlohe et al, ; Loxterman et al, ; Kovach et al, ; Young et al, ), relatively little work has focused on Yellowstone cutthroat trout hybridization (but see Kovach et al, ; Ostberg et al, , and others). It is an open question to what extent hybridization dynamics are consistent or variable across hybridizing pairs of species or subspecies within a genus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evidence for non-random population structure or mating), we used non-parametric bootstrap resampling over individuals (1000 replicates) to construct standard errors for the pRBT in each sample, and to construct confidence intervals around our test statistic (pRBT in adult fish -pRBT in juvenile fish). Non-random population structure in RBT Â WCT hybrid zones is relatively common [21,41] and probably reflects the combined effects of dispersal and selection ( [39] and see §3), and some degree of assortative mating owing to slight differences in reproductive timing [31]. We used a conservative a ¼ 0.01 as our significance threshold because the bootstrap method accounts only for sampling error, but error owing to genetic drift occurring between the adult and juvenile generations [42,43] may also be occurring.…”
Section: (C) Genetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and existing populations of YCT currently occupy thermally suitable streams (range of average daily temperatures May 1st to September 30th = 5.9–16.8 °C) at elevations ranging from 1168 to 3317 m. Extant populations of YCT continue to be vulnerable to the adverse effects of non‐native species (Gresswell, ). Populations of non‐native brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) and rainbow trout ( O. mykiss ) represent significant threats to YCT through competition (Destaso & Rahel, ; Seiler & Keeley, ; Buys et al ., ), higher survival via life‐history differences (Peterson et al ., ; McGrath & Lewis, ), and hybridization (Allendorf et al ., ; Gunnell et al ., ; Muhlfeld et al ., ; Kovach et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%