1969
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(69)90531-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridization properties of ribosomal RNA from rabbit tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gould et al (1966) analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis the products of limited digestion by T1 ribonuclease of rRNA (unfractionated) prepared from different organisms and from two cell types, reticulocytes and liver cells, of the same organism (rabbit): while they found differences in the pattern of degradation of the rRNA from different organisms, the rRNA from the two rabbit cell types analyzed gave identical results. Similarly, RNA-DNA hybridization experiments failed to show any difference in sequence between high molecular weight rRNA components prepared from rabbit reticulocytes and liver (Di Girolamo et al, 1969), or from different developmental stages of sea urchin (Mutolo and Giudice, 1967). The above-mentioned negative results could conceivably reflect the insensitivity of the analytical methods employed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gould et al (1966) analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis the products of limited digestion by T1 ribonuclease of rRNA (unfractionated) prepared from different organisms and from two cell types, reticulocytes and liver cells, of the same organism (rabbit): while they found differences in the pattern of degradation of the rRNA from different organisms, the rRNA from the two rabbit cell types analyzed gave identical results. Similarly, RNA-DNA hybridization experiments failed to show any difference in sequence between high molecular weight rRNA components prepared from rabbit reticulocytes and liver (Di Girolamo et al, 1969), or from different developmental stages of sea urchin (Mutolo and Giudice, 1967). The above-mentioned negative results could conceivably reflect the insensitivity of the analytical methods employed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%