Hybridizations and reconfigurations in the roles of actors in voluntary carbon offsetting

Chartier, Angéline; Demaze, Moïse Tsayem

doi:10.1080/13549839.2022.2091530

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The term “carbon offset” was introduced in the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 as a cooperative mechanism to help countries reduce greenhouse gas emissions 7 , offsetting domestic emissions through the purchase of carbon credits in the carbon market 8 . As a way to “neutralize” emissions, it has received extensive attention from scholars, and the academic community has mainly focused on forest carbon offset 9 , 10 , agricultural carbon offset 11 , fishery carbon offset 12 , watershed carbon offset 13 , and tourism carbon offset 14 – 16 .…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A study of the evolutionary game of carbon offset involving tourism stakeholders under incentive and constraint mechanisms

Li,

Xiong,

Yao

2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tourism carbon offsetting is a crucial pathway to achieving peak carbon and carbon neutrality in the tourism industry. Accurately grasping the collaborative evolutionary mechanisms among local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists is key to promoting the implementation of tourism carbon offsetting. By constructing an evolutionary game model involving local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists in carbon offsetting, this study uses MATLAB to simulate the evolutionary stable strategies under various conditions. Additionally, it dynamically simulates the collaborative strategies of the three parties under the influence of local government incentive and constraint mechanisms. The results indicate that under strong governmental constraint mechanisms, there is a promotion of active participation in carbon offsetting by local governments, tourism enterprises, and tourists. Incentive policies at certain levels also play a positive guiding role. As incentives increase, local subsidies and intervention costs also rise, leading to an evolution towards less enthusiastic participation among the three parties. Appropriately balanced government incentives and penalties are beneficial in achieving an equilibrium of benefits among multiple stakeholders involved in carbon offsetting, thus helping to attain carbon neutrality goals.

show abstract