2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42979-021-00882-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridized Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Fuzzy Support Vector Machines for Breast Cancer Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] and Muduli et al. [21] used the CNN architecture built from scratch and Customised CNN with less tuneable parameters and attained the accuracy of 91.2% and 90.68%, respectively. Recently, Oyetade et al.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[3] and Muduli et al. [21] used the CNN architecture built from scratch and Customised CNN with less tuneable parameters and attained the accuracy of 91.2% and 90.68%, respectively. Recently, Oyetade et al.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN detects features of an image like edges, corners etc., thus eliminating the feature extraction process by absorbing it in their architecture. A CNN has various layers, including input layer, processing layer consists of multiple convolutional, ReLU, and pooling layers, which are used to extract numerous features of an image followed by the fully connected layer that uses the features produced by previous layers in order to classify the image [21]. In addition, there are components, such as neurons, weights, bias factor, and activation functions (binary, linear, and non-linear).…”
Section: Deep Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They found out that rank-based stochastic process is the best-suited algorithm, obtaining an accuracy, sensibility, and specificity of 94.0%, 93.4%, and 94.6%, respectively, for classifying lesions for normal or abnormal using mammograms. Similar approaches have been proposed [ 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 ]. Table 2 presents a summary of the classifiers above discussed.…”
Section: Image Processing and Classification Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%