1937
DOI: 10.1056/nejm193711112172002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydatidiform Mole and Chorionepithelioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meyer (1919) has made a truly monumental contribution to the literature of 48 cases of hydatidiform degeneration in tubal pregnancies, but Novak (1947) discussing this, suggests that the diagnosis in most cases was based on uncertain stromal and vascular changes which have not obtained general acceptance, and Pettit (1941) also appears to have ignored Meyer's claims in her study of the cases previously reported. There is considerable disagreement also as to the frequency of hydatidiform mole in ectopic pregnancy, and although Phaneuf (1937) states that hydatidiform degeneration occurs in 3 per cent of all cases of ectopic pregnancy he does not quote a single case, and in a series of g cases of hydatidiform mole which he describes all werc uterine in situation. Sherman's (1935) agrees with Schumann that in theory the condition should occur fairly frequently, and indeed the tendency to hydatidiform change, particularly in an early transitional form, which has been noted in many abortions as well as in tubal pregnancy, as for example by Hertig and Edmonds (rg40), suggests that the condition should be fairly common, but the fact remains that very few unexceptionable cases have been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Meyer (1919) has made a truly monumental contribution to the literature of 48 cases of hydatidiform degeneration in tubal pregnancies, but Novak (1947) discussing this, suggests that the diagnosis in most cases was based on uncertain stromal and vascular changes which have not obtained general acceptance, and Pettit (1941) also appears to have ignored Meyer's claims in her study of the cases previously reported. There is considerable disagreement also as to the frequency of hydatidiform mole in ectopic pregnancy, and although Phaneuf (1937) states that hydatidiform degeneration occurs in 3 per cent of all cases of ectopic pregnancy he does not quote a single case, and in a series of g cases of hydatidiform mole which he describes all werc uterine in situation. Sherman's (1935) agrees with Schumann that in theory the condition should occur fairly frequently, and indeed the tendency to hydatidiform change, particularly in an early transitional form, which has been noted in many abortions as well as in tubal pregnancy, as for example by Hertig and Edmonds (rg40), suggests that the condition should be fairly common, but the fact remains that very few unexceptionable cases have been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%