2016
DOI: 10.1101/061994
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HydDB: A web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, while [NiFe]-hydrogenases are encoded in archaeal and bacterial genomes [32], no homologues of HycH are encoded in the operons of archaeal hydrogenases. For example, examination of the hydrogenase database HydDB indicates that there are group 4a Hyd enzymes in the archaea species Fervidicoccus fontis and Thermofilum pendens, but these lack HycH [34]. The same applies for other group 4 hydrogenases like those from Pyrococcus furiosus (group 4d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, while [NiFe]-hydrogenases are encoded in archaeal and bacterial genomes [32], no homologues of HycH are encoded in the operons of archaeal hydrogenases. For example, examination of the hydrogenase database HydDB indicates that there are group 4a Hyd enzymes in the archaea species Fervidicoccus fontis and Thermofilum pendens, but these lack HycH [34]. The same applies for other group 4 hydrogenases like those from Pyrococcus furiosus (group 4d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The genes of interest were retrieved from the downloaded metagenomes by BLAST using the hhyL, coxL, and rbcL1E gene sequences identified from the Robinson Ridge metagenome as queries. The identity of the retrieved type I coxL and type IE rbcL large subunit genes was confirmed by constructing phylogenetic trees as described above, whereas genes encoding group 1h [NiFe]-hydrogenase large subunits were identified using HydDB 53 . The relative abundance of the three genes was compared with those in five public forest metagenomes (JGI IDs 66726, 69782, 92543, 94443, 109646).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%