Proceedings of SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference 2007
DOI: 10.2523/106051-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic Fracturing Down Under

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact angle between the mercury and the siltstone used to calculate the pore size was 130°. Figure 2 shows the incremental intrusion volume vs. pore size in the mercury intrusion test, and the larger pore size at the first peak was caused by the destruction during the sample preparation process and the pore diameter ranges from several nanometers to several micrometers [24], which is Figure 2 shows the incremental intrusion volume vs. pore size in the mercury intrusion test, and the larger pore size at the first peak was caused by the destruction during the sample preparation process and the pore diameter ranges from several nanometers to several micrometers [24], which is confirmed by the SEM images in Figure 3. Although the siltstone was fine-grained, a high porosity up to 19.45% was obtained from the mercury intrusion tests.…”
Section: Sample Description and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact angle between the mercury and the siltstone used to calculate the pore size was 130°. Figure 2 shows the incremental intrusion volume vs. pore size in the mercury intrusion test, and the larger pore size at the first peak was caused by the destruction during the sample preparation process and the pore diameter ranges from several nanometers to several micrometers [24], which is Figure 2 shows the incremental intrusion volume vs. pore size in the mercury intrusion test, and the larger pore size at the first peak was caused by the destruction during the sample preparation process and the pore diameter ranges from several nanometers to several micrometers [24], which is confirmed by the SEM images in Figure 3. Although the siltstone was fine-grained, a high porosity up to 19.45% was obtained from the mercury intrusion tests.…”
Section: Sample Description and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%