2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic modeling of mussel habitat at a bridge-replacement site, Allegheny River, Pennsylvania, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large and diverse community of freshwater mussels still exists within the Allegheny River, particularly in the Allegheny's upper and middle reaches (Anderson, 1998;Smith et al, 2001;Fulton et al, 2010). The Allegheny River is~523 km in length with a drainage basin encompassing almost 30 000 km 2 in the northern Allegheny Plateau of New York and Pennsylvania (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A large and diverse community of freshwater mussels still exists within the Allegheny River, particularly in the Allegheny's upper and middle reaches (Anderson, 1998;Smith et al, 2001;Fulton et al, 2010). The Allegheny River is~523 km in length with a drainage basin encompassing almost 30 000 km 2 in the northern Allegheny Plateau of New York and Pennsylvania (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River substrate, hydraulics, and morphology are widely recognized as important factors in mussel distribution (Layzer and Madison, 1995;Hardison and Layzer, 2001;Morales et al, 2006). Previous studies have investigated many of these key physical factors in relation to population densities of mussels within numerous waterways around the United States and the world (Huehner 1987;Layzer and Madison, 1995;Hardison and Layzer, 2001;Morales et al, 2006;Zigler et al, 2008;Fulton et al, 2010). Although preference of specific sediment characteristics can vary depending on mussel species, substrate size and distribution are two major factors found to influence mussel population densities across sites (Vannote and Minshall, 1982;Huehner, 1987;Layzer and Madison, 1995;Brim Box et al, 2002;Steuer et al, 2008;Fulton et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the continental or regional scale, climate, geology, hydrology, and glacial history often account for observed patterns in mussel assemblages (Graf 1997, Haag 2010, Burlakova et al 2011. Within a habitat, substrate size, shear stress, and near-riverbed turbulence are important factors to explain mussel patchiness (Strayer 1999, Brim Box et al 2002, Steuer et al 2008, Fulton et al 2010. At a spatial scale between these 2, such as the watershed, changes in mussel assemblages have been related to land use (Arbuckle and Downing 2002, Diamond et al 2002, McRae et al 2004, Poole and Downing 2004, Brown et al 2010, Hopkins and Whiles 2011, Atkinson et al 2012, channel morphology (Gangloff andFeminella 2007, Brainwood et al 2008), stream-flow stability (McRae et al 2004, Morales et al 2006), water quality, and overloading of fine sediments (see reviews by Strayer et al 2004, Downing et al 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%